These were the 6 who voted NO to confirming Rosenstein. Why would Harris, Booker, Warren, Blumenthal, and Gillibrand not stand with their party and vote for RR? Why are they the loudest voices right now during the hearings et al? If RR was DIRTY, wouldn't these turds WANT him in? Or were they WORRIED of what might happen if he got in?

Rachel Brand has been OUT for 216 days. Does this fit with the succession timeframe that POTUS has of 210 days (see Q's post) to appoint a "temporary" AAG? The timing has to connect.

Rachel Brand was not only AAG, but was on the U.S. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. This was an EXECUTIVE BRANCH FUNCTION tied to FISA OVERSIGHT.

They have Highest Classification in order to review CLASSIFIED information. THIS WAS BO’s FIREWALL. It wasn’t about AAG- POTUS NEEDED HER OUT OF THE PRIVACY OVERSIGHT BOARD.

She was replaced on the Board by this person- a Republican lawyer.- https://www.linkedin.com/in/elisebethcook/

Removing Rachel was removing a BO Firewall.

>>3165293 (OP)

Adding a bit more sauce. POTUS could never had gotten FISAs through this year if Brand was still in the Oversight position. See what the PCLOB role is…-

Role and operations

The purpose of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board is two-fold: to analyze and review actions the executive branch takes to protect the nation from terrorism, ensuring that the need for such actions is balanced with the need to protect privacy and civil liberties; and to ensure that liberty concerns are appropriately considered in the development and implementation of law, regulations and policies related to efforts to protect the nation against terrorism.

The Board has two main functions: (a) advice and counsel on policy development and implementation and (b) oversight. Its functions include reviewing proposed legislation, regulations and policies; advising the President and the departments and agencies of the executive branch; and continually reviewing the implementation of the regulations, policies, and procedures of the executive branch relating to terrorism to ensure that privacy and civil liberties are protected. In addition, the Board is specifically charged with responsibility for reviewing the terrorism information sharing practices of executive branch departments and agencies to determine, whether they adhere to guidelines designed to appropriately protect privacy and civil liberties.[2][3] In the course of performing these functions, the Board shall coordinate with the privacy and civil liberties officers in the relevant departments and agencies.

The Board is authorized to have access to all relevant information necessary to fulfill its role, including classified information consistent with applicable law. The Board is required to report to Congress not less than semiannually.