Anonymous ID: 97eadc Sept. 26, 2018, 10:09 a.m. No.3193637   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4457 >>5058 >>3228 >>0600 >>8293 >>8375 >>5279 >>0880 >>5840 >>9767 >>2984 >>9165

The cabal made a synthetic volcano at their south pole secret space program area. The volcano is expanding uncontrollably. Extraterrestrials are assisting us because of the cabal's stupid out-of-control Earth-destroying toy volcano.

 

Why does the new Antarctica REMA topological map have a blurred out ~300 km wide circle at the pole that they refer to as the 'pole hole'? Why does google also blur the pole?

 

Why are Antarctic rivers red? This is historically / typically related to active volcanos, not to melt from glacial sheets. The articles about this river don't even mention Antarctica's highly volcanic history, even though this would be an intuitive thesis to explore for why the rivers steadily run red. The brightness of the red is from active volcanos; freeze layers from past eruption event are not melted all at once as to say the differential freeze layers are very different from the eventual differential melt layers through some arbitrary point in the ice. Volcanic activity also reduces ozone levels, perhaps they made this synthetic volcano around the time the ozone hole appeared. They might have made the volcano simply as a heater for their secret space program. If this or anything related to it was going to be in the 'remaining 20%' please reconsider the choice to retain information.

 

What did youtuber 'Florida Maquis' find happening at the apparently abandoned German research station? Were bodies kept inside that needed to be dealt with as the facility became re-exposed? Is the horrible bloody mess on the ice due to someone harvesting organs from these frozen bodies? Is there a 'canal' of sorts running from the perimeter of the ice sheet to the south pole area? Are there artifacts from Earth's past under the ice sheet? Are there artifacts that show Earth was 'manufactured'?

 

Does the cabal 'burry their bodies' in Antarctica? I wonder if there are any videos of them flying the Malaysian airplane directly into the lava of their toy volcano.

Anonymous ID: 97eadc Sept. 26, 2018, 10:02 p.m. No.3203228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3269 >>0143 >>8375 >>5279 >>0880 >>9767 >>2984 >>9165

>>3193637

>>3194457

The first three images show 'max zoom' allowed on features that seemed to accidentally remain after certain areas were blurred. One image appears almost like very large tracks, two others are more clearly arrangements of new material. An arrangement of material / large objects can be found in a few places on the edge of the blurred areas, so we can assume it is these features that are supposed to be hidden / that are problematic/secret. I thought these features looked like newly mounded material. If not from lava flow, this material could have been 'dropped' into a naturally conically-sloped rubble pile. Perhaps all CERN tunnel-boring machine material from secret projects is dumped in antarctica. Wasn't Elon M. recently selling the idea of construction bricks made from tunnel-boring rubble? The CERN tunnel spider's web might not have its center at 'CERN / the UN' but in Antarctica? Interesting to consider this reason for the material as well.

 

The last two images show a 'zoomed out' image of the arrangement of blurred areas radially extending from the near perfectly circular 'pole hole' area. These blurred areas might have this fairly radial pattern because they are all historical lava flows out from the central 'toy volcano.' There of course could be other reasons for a radial layout, but consider how the discernible features in the blurred area are not geometric like human construction would be, and appear to have a wavy / choppiness similar to a lava field. Given the material repeatedly ejects from one location, a 'near radial' arrangement is what one would expect.

 

not quite as thick as sauce, but tasty. The 'red river' – volcano connection I am sure could be sauced from academic sources. I'll try to find time to get a recipe going for that sauce too…

Anonymous ID: 97eadc Sept. 26, 2018, 10:13 p.m. No.3203326   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8375 >>5279 >>0880 >>9767 >>2984 >>9165

>>3203269

(and obviously there is a radial artifact of how they digitally selected areas. That is not interesting. I mean to say that if you draw outlines of the networks of 'stuff' that seems to be what is blurred, you can always continue within the outline inward or outward, but not around the hole / angularly. whatever is being blurred has a rough appearance of having been emitted from the center / pole hole.)

Anonymous ID: 97eadc Sept. 26, 2018, 11:38 p.m. No.3204063   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0600 >>8293 >>8375 >>5279 >>0880 >>9767 >>2984 >>9165

>>3203936

→ To me, your feature looks like a 'lava flow' with some momentum oozed through the low spot and cooled as it spread. Beyond this, the areas that are blurred are clearly geological and not by design. What else would radially cover areas in this way besides repeated partially overlapping lava flows? Maybe the volcano here is unique due to being at the pole, maybe the lava has a 'driven curl' to its flow such that there is a major problem with continual growth and ablation. …Maybe we are going to need some assistance healing our Earth; sky event…

 

In my attached image, The very dark areas are voids, likely the open mouths of dormant volcanos. The wavy features that seemed to escape editing are likely very jagged and irregular material, or jagged material with some flow interution / layered on top. The stereographic imaging would 'smooth over' features at some threshold of scale. These 'sand pile like' edge features could very well be quite jagged and irregular given the jaggedness is on a small enough scale. All of this looks inescapably geological and 'spontaneous', and I can't think of any other process that could move material so dramatically (aside from refuse from tunnel-boring, but wouldn't that have at least some 'human geometry' to the configuration? And why would they really need to go to the pole for tunnel refuse? There very well could be 'peculiar mantle/crust behavior' at the poles.

Anonymous ID: 97eadc Sept. 29, 2018, 12:12 a.m. No.3245863   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7203 >>6201 >>5840

roger that. I will post as soon as I receive a reply from the polar map researchers (and a statement of no response if 10 days pass.)

 

No, had never heard of Clif high, but I just visited some of his pages; interesting stuff. Couldn't find where he mentioned an Antarctic 'problematic' volcano theory.

 

will check out the phoenix journals related to SSPs and southern shenanigans, they look more than interesting…

 

cheers