Anonymous ID: 13c587 Sept. 24, 2018, 7:38 p.m. No.3173536   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3695 >>3778

Former Non-Profit President Charged with Scheme to Conceal Foreign Funding of 2013 Congressional Trip

 

Kemal Oksuz, aka Kevin Oksuz, 48, previously a resident of Arlington, Virginia, allegedly lied on disclosure forms filed with the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ethics prior to, and following, a privately sponsored Congressional trip to Azerbaijan.

 

  1. As a purported trip sponsor, and as required by the House Travel Regulations,

Defendant OKSUZ, on behalf of TCAE, completed the following seven (7) Trip Sponsor Forms to sponsor five (5) Members and two (2) Staffers:

 

a. Trip Sponsor Form submitted for House Member R.H.;

 

b. Trip Sponsor Form submitted for House Member J.B.;

 

c. Trip Sponsor Form submitted for House Member S.J.;

 

d. Trip Sponsor Form submitted for House Member T.P.;

 

e. Trip Sponsor Form submitted for House Member M.G.;

 

f. Trip Sponsor Form submitted for House Staffer D.A.;

 

g. Trip Sponsor Form submitted for House Staffer A.T.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-non-profit-president-charged-scheme-conceal-foreign-funding-2013-congressional-trip

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1096156/download

 

anons a little help - who could the 5 house members be?

Anonymous ID: 13c587 Sept. 24, 2018, 7:47 p.m. No.3173695   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3778

>>3173536

^^^^DOJ indictment unsealed today.

 

Related…2015 articles

 

House committee clears 9 lawmakers who went on Azerbaijan trip in 2013

 

The House Ethics Committee on Friday cleared nine lawmakers and more than 30 staff members of any wrongdoing for accepting an all-expenses-paid trip to Azerbaijan that was allegedly funded by that nation’s state-run oil company. Lawmakers received gifts of expensive rugs, crystal tea sets and other items during the trip.

 

Reps. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.) and Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.), chairman and ranking member of Ethics added “Since the House travelers acted in good faith, and the evidence was inconclusive as to the true source of the funds for the travel, the committee has concluded that the trips did not constitute an impermissible gift or travel, and decided that no further action is required regarding the House travelers acceptance of travel expenses.”

^^^^Interesting that DOJ unsealed an indictment today, though

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/house-ethics-committee-clears-lawmakers-2013-azerbaijan-trip-120869

Anonymous ID: 13c587 Sept. 24, 2018, 7:53 p.m. No.3173778   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3786 >>3914 >>3916 >>4013 >>4027 >>4089

>>3173695

>>3173536

IRAN NEXT? DOJ UNSEALED INDICTMENT TODAY - MOAR HUSSEIN/IRAN FUCKERY?

 

Following the May 2013 trip, a provision exempting the Shah Deniz natural gas project was inserted into legislation designed to expand sanctions on Iran. The National Iranian Oil Co. is a partner in the Shah Deniz project, along with SOCAR and other oil companies. Several lawmakers who took part in the Baku trip — Reps. Ted Poe (R-Texas), Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) and former Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) — served on the Foreign Affairs Committee at that time. That committee oversaw the Iranian sanctions legislation.

 

Earlier Iranian sanctions bills approved by Congress also exempted the Shah Deniz project, as had an executive order from President Barack Obama.

 

Other members who took part in the trip included Reps. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.), Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), Danny Davis (D-Ill.), Rubén Hinojosa (D-Tex.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), Leonard Lance (R-N.J.), and Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-N.M.).

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/house-ethics-committee-clears-lawmakers-2013-azerbaijan-trip-120869

 

DOJ press release:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-non-profit-president-charged-scheme-conceal-foreign-funding-2013-congressional-trip

Anonymous ID: 13c587 Sept. 24, 2018, 8:08 p.m. No.3173962   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4121 >>4147

>>3173870

>>3173917

MOAR

Government Procurement Fraud and the False Claims Act

 

Federal Acquisition Regulation

 

As of December 12, 2008, Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) amendments require a government contractor to self-disclose its own or its employees’ violations of criminal conduct, relating to fraud, conflict of interest, bribery or gratuities, or the FCA. The offenses must have occurred “in connection with the award, performance, or closeout” of the contract or subcontract.7 False statements are the most commonly charged offense in procurement fraud cases, and are used to penalize common forms of fraudulent procurement activity.8

 

FAR requires a contractor to timely disclose when it has credible evidence to believe a triggering violation has occurred.9 The disclosure typically should occur before a complete and thorough investigation is completed. Disclosure should be made within thirty days in order to take advantage of the provision in the FCA that rewards timely self-disclosures with a limit of doublerather than treble damages.10

 

The disclosure should specifically state that is being made in accordance with the mandatory disclosure provisions of FAR Section 52.203-13, and that the contractor has credible evidence that an offense has occurred subject to the mandatory disclosure provisions.11 This includes when a contractor learns that the government “has overpaid on a contract financing or invoice payment.”12 The disclosure should describe and identify the offense and provide general, preliminary factual information and a description of the damages.13

 

The FAR does not require a waiver of attorney client or work product privileges, but waiver may occur when information is disclosed to a third party.14 A 2008 amendment to the Federal Rules of Evidence limits subject matter waivers of privileged information following certain intentional disclosures to the federal government.15 This waiver, however, extends only to the information disclosed to the government, and does not extend to third parties absent a court order.16

 

Although contractors must comply with FAR mandatory disclosure requirements, they still retain the right to defend an investigation and not become deputies of the government, and the right to assert and preserve attorney-client privilege and work product Protection.17

 

These new regulations essentially shift the focus from management to law enforcement. In addition, it is feared that the requirements under the new regulations regarding “potential” civil FCA violations “will have a chilling effect on the discretionary decision making” of those involved because the new regulations effectively shift de facto management of the federal acquisition system to the Department of Justice.18 Increasingly, contract performance will be determined to be successful based on a contractor’s effective compliance programs.19

 

https://www.bafirm.com/publication/government-procurement-fraud-and-the-false-claims-act/

Anonymous ID: 13c587 Sept. 24, 2018, 8:16 p.m. No.3174052   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4059

>>3174030

except he worked for the firm that is representing Trump Campaign in the Russia investigation. He will need waiver from WH because he can't participate in matters related to former employers and clients for 2 yrs. See >>3170399 (pb #4013)