TY Baker!
>>3172977 (LB)
Precisely.
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1926578.html#1927025
>His choice?
>Remember, Kennedy was the swing vote.
>No more.
>Locked & Loaded.
RBG next.
>Q
TY Baker!
>>3172977 (LB)
Precisely.
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1926578.html#1927025
>His choice?
>Remember, Kennedy was the swing vote.
>No more.
>Locked & Loaded.
RBG next.
>Q
Hmmm. Q drops wtih Accusations:
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1392388.html#1392849
>Sealed indictments.
>Define indictment.
>“An indictment is a formal accusation against one or more defendants, charging them with one or more crimes. In the federal criminal system, the indictment is the principal method by which a prosecutor initiates criminal proceedings.”
>How are they sealed?
>How are they secured?
>How are they safeguarded?
>No leaks [unusual?]
>Federal vs ….
>Why are accusations sealed?
>Grand jury involved?
>Re_read crumbs re: DOJ / FBI re: IG / Huber
>Who appointed Huber?
>SESSIONS.
>WHAT DEPTS MUST BE CLEANED PRIOR TO REC FAIR AND EQUAL [JUSTICE] UNDER THE LAW?
>What happens if FED [criminal] indictments are brought forth to a corrupt FBI / DOJ / FED Judge?
>FBI / DOJ - 1st.
>C_A / State - next?
>Now comes the pain.
>Q
https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/274473.html#274601
Would POTUS make a serious accusation if the TRUTH wasn’t about to come to LIGHT?
>Black Forest.
>Austria.
>Rothschild.
>FIRE sale days after post?
>What went on there?
>Dopey.
>You have more than you know.
>Q
Also, the "C" to "Q" is probably a nod to anons, but I'm really interested in the first of these 2 Q posts. It would seem to indicate that the truth behind the indictments could be public soon. 13 days? That's Oct 7th. I wonder if we get a Q post to clarify?
I thought we nailed this down. It's really simple, actually:
Read it literally.
>No.
>Highest classification.
>Consider the vastness of space.
>Q
No, we're not alone. Yes, our government knows it. Use your brain; space is too big for us to be the only ones. Now, take the OTHER Q quote on this into consideration:
https://8ch.net/cbts/res/126564.html#126948
>How far away is the closest star?
>What do you think?
>Q
UFOs are, indeed, a distraction. That doesn't mean we haven't been visited, as the events that unfolded in NM are still of the highest level of classification. However, to what we're doing RIGHT NOW, UFOs are a distraction.
Think of it this way. You want to reveal humanity's status in the universe (known or otherwise) to the current state of people? We can't even build a fucking wall without getting emotionally distracted; let alone handle some "War of the Worlds" type of scenario running through people's pee-brains 24x7. That right there really would put people in a fucking hurt locker, and send humanity into a downward spiral.
"We" really aren't ready for that shit. Not in the least.