Anonymous ID: 5c7467 Sept. 25, 2018, 12:54 a.m. No.3175981   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6096 >>6412

WASHINGTON – Google Chief Executive Sundar Pichai plans to appear at a private meeting of top GOP lawmakers on Friday and again at a public hearing this year, responding to new scrutiny of the company's work with China, its market power and alleged bias against conservatives in its search results.

 

The move comes amid growing regulatory concerns for the Alphabet Inc. unit and other big internet services such as Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc., as bipartisan worries grow about the companies' size and influence, as well as the potential for abuses.

 

"Google has a lot of questions to answer about reports of bias in its search results, violations of user privacy, anticompetitive behavior and business dealings with repressive regimes like China," said House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.), who is organizing Friday's meeting. He added that Mr. Pichai has "kindly" agreed to field Congress's questions with Republican members on Friday. Mr. Pichai also is expected to appear at a House Judiciary Committee hearing after the November election.

 

Mr. McCarthy has complained that Google works with China to censor the internet but has canceled a contract with the U.S. military. Google this year said it wouldn't renew a contract with the U.S. Department of Defense over employee concerns about aiding military projects; the company has also tested a mobile version of its search engine that would adhere to China's strict controls over content, a person familiar with the matter said.

 

The tech industry began facing serious political challenges last year, amid revelations of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, but Google initially escaped some of the intense scrutiny that Facebook and Twitter have endured. Since then, however, the company has drawn fire over privacy on its Gmail service and allegations by conservatives that its search results stifle their viewpoints. Lawmakers have also expressed frustration with Google for not sending a top-level executive to a recent hearing.

 

"I look forward to meeting with members on both sides of the aisle, answering a wide range of questions, and explaining our approach. These meetings will continue Google's long history of engaging with Congress, including testifying seven times to Congress this year," Mr. Pichai said.

 

Mr. McCarthy, who is aiming to help preserve the GOP's House majority and improve his chances of becoming speaker, has emerged as a vocal critic of the tech companies in recent months, as conservative voters appear to be focusing more on the issue of alleged political bias. He has been joined by President Trump, who recently accused Google of manipulating search results to highlight negative news reports about him.

 

Tech firms deny that they skew their news feeds, search or other functions to boost liberals or hurt conservatives.

 

Democrats including Sens. Mark Warner of Virginia and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts have also criticized Google on China and other issues.

 

Additional meetings planned for Washington this week could provide a glimpse of what steps policy makers and regulators could take to rein in the tech giants.

 

On Tuesday, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions is expected to meet with state attorneys general to discuss alleged stifling of conservative speech online, as well as possible antitrust concerns over Google as well as Facebook and others. On Wednesday, the Senate Commerce Committee holds a hearing focused on internet privacy concerns, amid growing bipartisan calls for legislation to govern online data collection and use.

 

Tech firms also are facing a new documentary by a prominent conservative author, Peter Schweizer. The film, entitled "The Creepy Line," raises allegations that tech firms hold too much power and suppress conservative views.

 

Conservatives' current focus on big tech clearly has a potential political upside. A majority of Republicans – 64% – say major tech companies support the views of liberals over conservatives, according to a recent Pew Research Center poll.

 

Allegations of anticonservative bias also could help divert attention from Russian meddling in the 2016 election that appeared to use tech platforms such as Facebook to manipulate public opinion and support Mr. Trump.

 

But the current antitech atmosphere goes beyond political maneuvering. As concerns grow among lawmakers and regulators, the debate appears to be expanding from politics to policy, and prospects for new regulation are increasing, no matter who wins the midterm election and control of the House and Senate.

Anonymous ID: 5c7467 Sept. 25, 2018, 1:04 a.m. No.3176038   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 73f652 No.896069 📁

Apr 4 2018 17:09:08 (EST)

Example.

Gateway Bridge Project.

$1.8mm Cory Booker - Singapore.

$3.5mm Chuck Schumer - Israel.

$400k Chris Christie - Mary Pat US.

……..

Omnibus Bill.

The gift that keeps on giving.

Q

 

 

Can some wise Anon explain this please?

Anonymous ID: 5c7467 Sept. 25, 2018, 1:19 a.m. No.3176141   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6412

ImperatorRex / twitter/ 1/2

 

  1. Trump and his people have been working behind the scenes on this, from Day 1. That means the Democrats who did this, as well as their backers, are SCREWED. And should be terrified.

 

  1. If you've read threadmasters such as @ThomasWictor & @drawandstrike (as well as others) over the last 2 years, you know that over the decades, Trump has built a formidable security/ intel network of PIs, spies, informants & ex-spooks. His own 100% loyal preatorian guard.

 

  1. Trump would have needed his own army in the US construction scene. It's one of the most ruthless, violent business environments on earth. Only the toughest apex predators survive. None have survived longer than DJT and before him, his father.

 

  1. Sure, Trump would have bodyguards. No disrespect intended to the Secret Service, but I'm certain his personal guard would be the equal, if not better, than any other on the planet. However, the main objective of his people wouldn't be physical protection.

 

  1. It would be gathering INFORMATION. For business, defense and offense. In business, the 'art of the deal' is no fluke. Trump is such an effective negotiator, because he's often known his rivals' strategy, before the negotiation starts. He ALWAYS has leverage.

 

  1. This was an essential component of his Presidential

campaign. With NO media support, weak GOP backing & (as we know now) a corrupt Obama admin working in cahoots with Hillary Clinton to rig the election, one of Trump's main weapons was INFORMATION. Consider this:

 

  1. Trump has been planning his Presidency since at least the late 1970s. @ThomasWictor argues it was even earlier, as far back as 1969. Even if you use 1980 as a start point, by 2016 he had had 35/6 YEARS to observe America's power brokers in Congress, the media and Hollyweird.

 

  1. Using his access and 'cloak' as the buffoonish narcissist, the teetotal Trump would have carefully LISTENED as the wealthy & powerful drank his liquor and revealed ALL. After all, from their POV, 'The Donald' was no threat. They would have been convinced Trump needed them.

 

  1. It's not hard to imagine the scene. Trump, flattering (say) the Clintons. 'You guys are just so great. Such wonderful people. I wish I could be as good as you. Tell me : is it true what I hear about Harvey?' BTW, Weinstein, 2017? Be in no doubt. That was a TRUMP operation.

 

  1. Ditto, the odious Eric Schneiderman. I'm certain that Trump has gathered dirt on ALL his enemies, for use when required. He doesn't want to, but if necessary, he WILL act. Remember, these are necessary defensive measures, against people who seek to destroy him & his family.

Anonymous ID: 5c7467 Sept. 25, 2018, 1:20 a.m. No.3176149   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6412

ImperatorRex / twitter/ 2/2

 

  1. But HOW does he get the intel? This isn't made up fiction, but REAL EVIDENCE. Consider the Kavanaugh situation. IMO, Trump has known EXACTLY what the Dem strategy was for MONTHS. Because his people have informants on the inside.

 

  1. @ThomasWictor points out that Trump's people have probably had moles inside the Democrats, for some time now. These may well be Dem operatives. But don't discount the cafeteria lady, doorman, security guy or any other 'admin staff', either. MANY would be Trump supporters.

 

  1. Trump's key people are BRILLIANT at what they do. Take Keith Schiller, Trump's feared security chief. #FakeNews, lazy as hell, reported that he retired on 20 September, 2017. Maybe he did. I consider it highly unlikely.

 

  1. IMO, he 'faded away' into the shadows, to work on projects assigned to him. A SCOTUS confirmation would be a classic example. It would be EASY for Schiller and his team to infiltrate the Dems, find out their strategy for a Kavanaugh nomination & then to report back to HQ.

 

  1. With ALL the documentation they could legally find. Let's say Trump, Grassley and McConnell have known all about the #BlaseyFord & #Ramirez smears since August. What to do? Option #1: reveal all before the hearings. #2: reveal all during the hearings. #3: AMBUSH.

 

  1. Wait until they move, let them believe they have the element of surprise, feign weakness, disorder and chaos (Grassley), let them over-extend their supply lines. Then, BOOM - DESTROY THEM. For those who wonder if the damage has already been done - WAIT.

 

  1. The key moment isn't NOW, as painful as it might be to endure. The critical moment is when we have VICTORY. Or TWO victories.: #1 - Kavanaugh's confirmation as a SCOTUS judge. #2 - The Democrats implosion in the mid-terms.

 

  1. Both strategic objectives are 100% ON TRACK. McConnell has said that he will keep the Senate open during recess, to get the confirmation done. The Dems can't avoid that harsh reality. And given the way the Dems have conducted themselves /…

 

  1. /…with this disgusting smear campaign, as well as in the hearings themselves, ask yourself : The Dems will always have their lunatic supporters, but what will the independent voters think about them? Or traditional Dem supporters? ESPECIALLY the Moms, with sons?

 

  1. IMO, the vast majority will conclude that the Democratic Party of the USA has gone TOTALLY INSANE. If every #MAGA supporter votes, we could be looking at a hollowed out shell of a Dem Party on Nov 7, 2018. A fringe group of extremist leftists, baying at the moon.

 

  1. Strategic objective # 2 (above) - achieved. Back to my first tweet - Don't be distracted by all the hysteria. Trump's people have this situation under control. They have had, for months. The Dems & #FakeNews, drum on arrogance and hatred, just haven't realized it yet.

 

  1. Remember : the night is darkest, just before the dawn. And never forget who is in control: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/380922018717515776 … #MAGA The end.

Anonymous ID: 5c7467 Sept. 25, 2018, 2 a.m. No.3176362   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Social Democrat leader Stefan Löfven has been voted out of the job by a majority of parliament – the first Swedish prime minister to be ousted in such a vote.

 

 

https://www.thelocal.se/20180925/swedish-prime-minister-stefan-lofven-confidence-vote

Anonymous ID: 5c7467 Sept. 25, 2018, 2:06 a.m. No.3176387   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6397 >>6401 >>6403

Anons, can you fucking imagine, that while POTUS is fighting deep state in US, he is fighting with deep states in GB, AUS, NZ, Japan, NK, Russia, Israel, France, EU, China, etc

 

Scale of this is fucking insane