Love, love, love DJT's excoriation of UN Human Rights and ICC. Both are globalist control mechanisms. What a great leader! A politician who speaks like a human being and supports the people, instead of an agenda-driven mouthpiece for globalists.
Britanon.
>The reason he scorched ICC, is because he knows they were going to use that against him after the arrests. That he had become a dictator jailing opposition etc etc use of Guantanamo etc etc
No doubt.
I've always believed the Criminal element of the ICC referred to those running the court, not to the populations it claimed a false jurisdiction over.
> I just don't see that happening under POTUS.
No, thank God. But it would have under HRC. And the EU would have gone along with it, and the UK and most of the world.
Incrementalism - exactly how the Common Market (ostensibly a trade agreement) was transmogrified into a political union with barely a whisper of protest from somnambulent populations. I'm proud to claim that I voted against joining the Common Market back in 1972 and have fought its insidious expansionism ever since - only to be betrayed by Theresa May's so-called "soft" Brexit plan which is no Brexit at all, except in name.
>Roger Stone does not like Kavanaugh
From where I'm sitting across the pond, Kavanaugh will make a brilliant SC Justice because his first loyalty id to the Constitution and he is impartial as far as politics is concerned - as ALL judges should be. It's the left that stuffs courts with political acolytes to threaten the rule of law and bring down a country from within.
>If his loyalty lies elsewhere (yale, S&B, Bush) then he needs to go.
I'd agree with that. But all his judgements to date indicate that he is a fierce Constitutionalist, even finding in favour of political opponents if the Constitution demands it. And unless or until I see different, I'll believe him for his track record.
>Are things
>
>Getting
>
>Weird… For anyone else
No. Things are getting better and better as DJT touches base with reality instead spouting a delusional, leftist narrative. That's when things were weird. Whenn most of the population believed lefty lies and were totally deluded. As more and more people wake up, the world is become less weird and more grounded in reality.
typo: instead OF spouting…
>No, anon. It is not our business to interfere and impose our moral beliefs onto women who find themselves in the position of making a choice. Yes, it is a choice.
>
If you truly believe that then consistency demands that we should not impose our moral belief that murder is wrong.
Consider this: human life is TRANSMITTED via the fertilisation of egg and sperm. It is procreated not created. Conception is a uniques expression of individuated life and for that reason, it's unrepeatability, every conception is precious.
Any woman who has more than two children yet is pro abortion should honestly ask herself, which of her children she would choose to have had aborted. A subsequent conception does not replace the destroyed child. It is a completely different child. So look at your children and make a hindsight choice - which would you have killed?