>>3179635

TY BAKER! You're fine. Anons impatient.

Q (usually) waits for the dough. You should, too!!!

>>3179544 (lb)

I knew it was bad for them when I hit up LdR on twitter one day, and she actually replied. Got under her skin pretty fucking good, too. It was a few weeks later that she deleted her twatter. It was like that moment In Ghostbusters 2 when the team did all the heavy lifting against Viggo inside the art museum, and then Rick Moranis shows up outside the building and zaps the pink bubble; seemingly making it shatter.

I get I'm the Rick Moranis in that scenario, but I'm still proud just to have been there; lol.

>>3179702

Huh…

Are those same UN people that have member states in the EU that are now buying US Natural Gas to supplant their failing solar panel grids? Just curious…

>>3179755

This is some stale-assed pasta.

>>3179699

>So, if I understand you correctly, if a woman knows that she is very likely to die if a pregnancy continues she should just place her faith in God and hope she doesn't?

The most often performed and (and most highly successful) operation in the entire world is a C-Section. We've also made the most advances in medicine in regards to mothers and pregnancy than any other. How often does the scenario of life-threatening pregnancy occur? What is your statistic?

Go ahead, and toss in that "what about rape/incest" argument and watch those reported incidences increase 1000% once the c-section argument deflates that "life-threatening" scenario. Even better, let's see just how many are seeking abortions once all these trafficking operations get shit-hammered (currently in the works). You're basically going to be left with a few hundred cases a year that could be authentic.