>>3180241
>I hope you're real so I'm not just wasting my time here.
>
>I'm trying to help you separate from your quick knee jerk emotional response so you can see that not everyone has the same resources or amount of patience that you've been privy to. Due to these things, it's simply not logical to disallow abortions across the board. I'm trying to help you understand that some people here try to push pendulum too far in the opposite direction by suggesting that ALL abortion should be illegalized, while instead what really makes more sense is to take away government funded abortion, return the right of liberty to the people, and shrink government influence.
>
>The methods I've used are methods often used with other anons: "learn the culture"
>
>To understand these things, you need logic and not emotion: "abandon your emotions"
>
>By the way, I can tell you're a woman.
>
>Lurk moar
Your concern is recognised. However, I've probably got more life experience under my belt than you've even dreamed of.
Logic is good but that doesn't mean it should be divorced from emotion. Therein lies the kind of amoral capitalism that globalists espouse - money and power because logic dictates that's what gets a person to the top pf the tree.
There is nothing wrong with emotions until they govern rational thought.
There is nothing wrong with rational thought until it disregards emotions.
You're trying too hard, anon and, in the process, exposing the limitations of your capacity for critical thinking.