Substituted words. Wrong usage, as has been pointed out. Nor misspellings. Juggling of letters may be the correct telltale, rather than misspellings.
The word, acquisitions, has one letter more than the word, accusations. Depending how one reads the letters that are not in common between the two words, the letter Q stands out.
The letter, S, is in common. Sometimes it is useful to think of letters as characters in a story. Sometimes less so.
The remaining letters may be hints.
ISI = International Statistical Institute.
CSA = Child Sexual Abuse
CB wrote at least one professional research article on CSA. Her area of expertise is statistical modeling for clinical research.
Apart from that, there is a potential reference to C_A, yes.
As always, one can look for anagrams – but these tend to rely on confirmation bias, which is not a bad thing if it is acknowledged in light of the context in which deciphering is applied here. Not a decisive thing, but not a bad thing.
Each phrase, False Acquisitions and False Accusations, contain multiple anagrams that may be useful in stimulating one's thinking.
At the very least the anagram one might judge as most appropriate will serve to place on the surface one's bias, confirmed. And that, too, is useful. In fact, I do think that Q knows us well enough to shape the comms to us as much as Q has encouraged us to become familiar with Q's comms.
In this case it is President Trump's communication which may be another confirmation or Q proof co-ordinated between POTUS and Q.
More interesting, to me, than the anagrams are the comms. Anagrams are just one of many ways to spark and ignite.
Characters on a stage.