Honor to the Baker Of The Digits!
Re:
>>3180654 lb
>>3180734 lb
^^Agreed^^
and re...
>>3180890 lb
>There has to be a better way to research topics individually, gathering all the research already gotten by autists, than literally going through every bread.
See above. Agreed we could use topics curator(s) who go through bread notes and add them to relevant topic threads, but the purpose of the General is to have an all-house meeting, for all researchers to be informed by the latest in all relevant topics. We don't want this functionality removed. However, nothing's lost by having additional volunteers stepping up to provide additonal functionality, such as linking to topic threads.
As for what's notable in General, a few weeks ago I wrote up a set of editorial guidelines for I posted a few breads back:
>>3018740 #3819
Not saying all bakers follow this, or should follow it, just that I try to follow a consistent rubric. It allows me to defend editorial choices with clear, pre-thought-out reasoning when disputes come up, which allows me the best framework to evaluate Anon response re: A/B testing. The goal is to give the digging autists the best environment to continue digging. The rubric was evolved for that purpose. Whether normie/newfag/newsies aren't comfy with that environment is lower in priority. They have other platforms, ours is for autists to dig Q drops.