sdr?
its not about advantages or disadvantages. Its about logic and sourcing material.
Here is the scenario: We are hear for Qresearch and to dig and meme on the DS. That requires logical conclusions with backed sources.
Here is the problem: "[insert logical argument for xyz]…oh and im a female"
What has happened in this type of statement made over and over is either one of two things. 1. the woman is using their womaness as source for logical reason or
-
the woman is using their womaness as authority over the logical arguement.
Unless its about biology or anatomy of a woman body there isnt much authority over a logical argument.
YET its used over and over.
So the solution to the problem is this: We all see through this, whatever point or argument or logical conclusion trying to be made is thrown out BECAUSE the authority you claim over said argument is your womaness and that really isnt any sort of authority. Therefor your logic is ignored and your only value SINCE THE WOMAN THEMSELVES USED THEIR WOMANESS is the womaness itself in the form of their tits.
It has ZERO to do with being sexist or degrading the significance one can make as a woman.
The other issue is anonymity. We are anons here.
In short. If you attempt to use your womaness as authority over an argument, ie I think this because im a woman or oh by the way im a female, then you no longer have a valid argument. The use of your womaness by the woman themselves is highlighted because they themselves drew attention to it. Hence tits or gtfo.