>>3181834

oh shut the fuck up. as if every post on here is work-related. as if tits or gtfo is used solely when a woman tries to use her womanhood as a claim to authority. how often does that even happen?

tits or gtfo is used anytime a woman mentions anything related to being a woman or even hints at the fact that she's not a man

>my husband

how often do men refer to their girlfriends and wives on here?

men genderfag all the time

women only bring up the fact that they are women when it's relevant, or casually, the way men do

i have rarely seen any woman bring up her gender the way you're describing because most women who are on here have the intelligence to understand that being a woman doesn't have anything to do making a logical argument.

none of your excuses hold water

tits or gtfo is stupid

>>3181964

what about if you declare yourself a man which happens every 2 minutes? that's seeking to individualize?

or if you casually mention your age-range? individualizing??

there is nothing special about being a woman. just like there is nothing special about being a boomer. or an accountant or any other random demographic information that anons casually drop about themselves all of the time, never in an attempt to seek attention.

this argument holds no water either

next!

>>3182010

a lot of anons? i have never seen it used correctly and i've been here for months. "abuse" is the normal way it is used. if you're on here, you're likely intelligent enough to not make the mistake of using your gender as a claim to authority. it rarely happens. we're not idiots. we get how the anonymous thing works. but none of you are gender-anonymous when you refer to your wives or fucking your girlfriends or whatever fucking else you shitpost about when you're not digging meming and praying.

>>3182047

show me when a woman says "i have tits so i want preferential treatment"

1. it is obviously never that overt

2. i was hyperbolizing. a man doesn't need to say I AM A MAN. just like women who are attacked with "tits or gtfo" hardly ever say I AM A WOMAN. they just refer to their gender casually. i will scroll and find you some posts but we are only 132 posts into the bread.

>>3182041

what are you talking about? what actions am i trying to justify? i am anonymous all the time. today i just felt like opening my mouth instead of being a pussy. and i didn't include you in anything.. do you know how to read? do you know what an impersonal/generic "you" is?

sad.

>>3182069 yea i get why it was made. maybe anons could use a reminder and stop abusing it then.

>>3182087 i belong here. i didn't have the fortune of knowing this place existed years ago and wasted my life on other asinine sites but i belong here just like all of you do and nothing anyone can say can convince me otherwise. just because i am relatively new doesn't mean this isn't my home. to be honest, in the future, all social media will be modeled on the chans. we are moving away from like buttons and human branding.

>>3182118 ok dropping it. idk why i'm mad i usually ignore this shit.

>>3182118

>>3182137 understood, i'm dropping it

>>3182163 oh no my feelings are really hurt! i am so embarrassed! thanks for letting me know wow!

dumbass.

>>3182216 not mine, but here are some tits to end this lovely debate of ours

>>3182223

dude they get paid to protest. no one actually gives a shit, i promise you. people are too busy with their own lives. none of this shit is real. propaganda. astroturfing. camera tricks.

>>3182262

kek

>>3182276

thanks

>>3182299 according to the source below, approximately 4.93% of american women as of 2010. i don't care enough to look for more recent statistics but i would imagine that number has increased. i have no personal knowledge of this matter and don't know anyone who does. i hope that answer was sufficient for you, anon.

>>3182334

>>3182299

forgot sauce https://www.pacificheightsplasticsurgery.com/breast-implant-statistics/

>>3182388

ok concernfag, do you not realize an entire reality is being constructed to fool you into thinking "adult woman" aren't going to vote red in november?

adult women are waking up. the women you're talking about didn't vote for trump and are a lost cause until shit hits the fan. we'll be fine, don't worry.

>>3182444 checked

>>3182468

exactly. and most women have experienced worse. not to mention they were both underage and the statute of limitations has run out. this is just one big stalling tactic.

>>3182489

>candidate for blunt-force sterilization

nice..

go back to baking.

>>3182418

that is not how this whole thing started and why would i know anyone who's had a boob job? i don't think i've ever even seen fake boobs in real life

and i don't actually but i love boobs too, they're great, nothing against them

just the gtfo part i didn't like but i'm over it

have a great day

>>3182649 it's not that deep man. new bread soon.

>>3182684 well no coincidences there