>>3187559

What they do in their own lives is their own shitshow.

Here in the real world we maintain the right to due process and to evidence that must be weighed.

These fucking retards never stop to think what real life would be like if anyone could denounce them (personally) for appalling crimes and never need to prove the case.

Some of them perhaps need to feel the consequences of their own preferences, just as a gratuitous example of why “innocent until proven guilty” is the legal standard bequeathed by history .

>>3187640

I was merely commenting on the Anglo-Saxon legal system we have, historically, worked within and which used to be agreed was mostly a “good thing.”

I don’t for a moment foreclose the metaphysical possibility that what we perceive as “reality” is nothing of the sort.

Merely that whatever reality we do perceive is no solipsism, because we can agree among ourselves, to some extent, on its general physical and experiential contours; and that, within those agreed contours, something termed an Anglo-Saxon (and Celtic) legal system pertains in some places. And it’s protected countless thousands of people (as far as we can empirically confirm) from arbitrary and unjust punishment.

>>3187998

Indeed, anon. The model is not necessarily “kill or be killed”. That’s an extremely unskillful response to our shared existential issues.

We are by nature family/tribal beings where cooperation and kindness has distinct long term societal benefits.

>>3188004

Oh, dear heart, this predates the odious Obamas by decades.

I wasn’t even a twinkle in the milkman’s eye when this shit started, and I’ve been around for more than 50 summers.

Some social history would, respectfully, be something worth studying: the trajectory of propaganda programming and technological control since WWII will scare the shit out of you, but it must be understood in order to be counteracted.