Anonymous ID: 22d174 Feb. 9, 2018, 4:15 p.m. No.318973   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9029 >>9111 >>9209 >>9495

>>318779

 

In order to get to the caPstone of the /_\ that Q told us about from the first mention, the base ans sides that support it must be removed.

P P

  • /_\

++

+++

 

THEN, whoever or whatever the hell P is can be dealt with.

This, is why it hasn't been dealt with in the past, and why the process is not as quick as some anons would like for it to be. [P] has always been sheltered P-rotected, to the point where we can't even be sure who or what the hell P is!

 

>>318815

Expand your thinking anon, be an autist. Also, Re_read the crumbs, If Q has clearly stated that the Roths are only one side of the pyramid, how can they simultaneously be the top?

It's possible that none of our ideas about who or what P is, until it's revealed to us by Q or by future proving past. It's ok to admit when we don't know something 100%, that allows for us to actually figure it out. Those with definite final answers I'm wary of, because it's likely that we're still working with incomplete information, we're not done with this yet. AND, yes, all that said, I could be wrong too. Hive mind and all though, I still won't limit my thoughts to general consensus of anons as a final answer. Thinking for ourselves is still valuable here.

Anonymous ID: 22d174 Feb. 9, 2018, 4:41 p.m. No.319209   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>318919

P could be entirely symbolic, and not an initial. When I saw Providence posted by anon, I couldn't help but as WHO or WHAT is the Eye of Providence, who Provides for those 3 families? I remember hearing time and time again pre-Q, that those who are REALLY in charge, do not have their names publicly available. That much $ and Power, can conceal names for centuries if they so chose. So, highly possible that the P is symbolic

 

>>318815

>>318982

We may be giving the Rothschild fucks too much credit. Their rule began at some point (late 1700s), so, who was in charge even before them?

The triad of + ++ +++ are major influences in AMERICA, well, who holds the global scepter?

 

>>318960

Missing (i) of Providence...hmmm, double meanings/expanded thinking. I can dig-it

 

>>319029

My thinking is based on the sauce (Q), not on anons guesses. That's why there's conflict. Whoever P is, in my mind, MUST be outside the influence of /_\, and thus, above them all. Roths have only been in the game since late 1700s. This is a game of millennia that's been played, they're the oldest out of the group, with the House of Sauds only being in since the 1930s when their oil was discovered. Soros, well, he takes orders, so def not him. And, if one side of the pyramid was taking orders, why not all 3? Just logical to me.

 

ALL: see >>318973 for the more along this line of expanded thinking

 

Who had more power than the Pope in GODFATHER III? Who had the power to have a Pope killed. Expand you thinking.

Anonymous ID: 22d174 Feb. 9, 2018, 5:07 p.m. No.319453   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3319355

>>319405

How does though expand if limited to only 750 posts?Even though the subject came up 2 months ago, there have been zero Q confirmations to any anons's conclusions, so the question of P remains. Until future proves past, said subject, and many more, will be recurring. nothing wrong with that being that this IS a research board. Even projects & products deemed as "finished", can continue to be developed.

Anonymous ID: 22d174 Feb. 9, 2018, 5:25 p.m. No.319593   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>319495

I'm glad tht you brought up the British Crown, and why I mentioned earlier that the roths are barely 200+ years in. the British Empire precedes them by at least 300 years.

Q pointed us to

>SA → US → Asia → EU

EU appearing to be the "end game", so to speak. Yet, not quite. Currently Phillip is a VERY LIKELY candidate for being soros' P (3 Q references to queen Elizabeth alludes to this also). Yet, even the charters for the British empire originated @ the Vatican, so they can't be ruled out either as containing the ultimate controllers..

 

Now, for the drug trafficking…I'm of the mind that big Pharma is not necessarily in competition with the illegal drug trade, because it's an EXTENSION of that oldie but goodie illegal drug trade! Creating addicts both legally and illegally, makes for easier populations worldwide to control.

 

>Oil +++

>Banks ++

>Drugs +

also agreed, because

Gold ++

Oil +++

Drugs+

In "GOD" they trust