>>319216

If we don't get pulled into responding (and I have been setting NO example) they might as well not be here. Just read around them. It's not that hard. We can continue to function.

Where would be focusing maybe 10x more effectively if the religion shills weren't overrunning the board? Most anons seem incapable of resisting the bait. Or the ones responding are shills as well. Still, the question remains: where would we be if they were not here? The more we focus on P, the more intense it gets. Seems we hit a nerve and must stay on target.

Nobody says "Pope." It's always "THE Pope." Q said "Soros takes orders from P. You have no idea how sick and evil these people are. Day of days."

What P is unfathomably sick and evil? The Pope would qualify, and maybe that's the answer.

Q refers to movies a lot. There is a movie called Day of Days. Synopsis:

"91-year-old Walter Leland has decided this day will be his last. He's lived a good if lonely life, estranged from his only son. His home aide for the day is Marisol Castillo, a Cuban refugee who witnessed her young son drowning in the desperate boat crossing 10 years before. Through a quiet and stunning duet of revelation, Walter and Marisol forge an unlikely connection that leads to acceptance, forgiveness and the recognition that life may end, but love lives forever."

You don't have to be directly engaged with the shills for them to win. Talking ABOUT them pulls your focus away from Q. Talking about us responding to them pulls your focus away from Q. ANYTHING that wouldn't be posted if they weren't here makes their mission a success. Which, actually, I'm doing right now so back to the Q material.