Anonymous ID: 0d108f Sept. 25, 2018, 10:08 p.m. No.3189029   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

The Ford letter to Feinstein is looking more and more like a fraud.

There are several news articles on this already.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/multiple-discrepancies-discovered-in-senator-feinsteins-christine-ford-letter-looks-like-a-fraud/

 

the article is similar to the breakdown of itemized errors

listed in the last bread

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3187264.html#q3187806

 

Logically:

if you were a highly educated woman (who didn't buy her doctorate)

you would care about your presentation to a Senator

if you wanted to be believed as intelligent

 

the sloppiness of the letter itself

may depict a "dummy" letter proposed as an idea for political ends

it isn't edited even in a word processing program

that corrects improper grammar, or suggests better grammar

 

IMO- for what it's worth –

it was never meant to be taken seriously

and is likely a construct from a conversation by another person

who wasn't even sure who the person was who sent it

 

("hey, Chrissie, would you be willing to be a stand-in for a rape letter we've come up with?")

 

Feinstein has passed it off as a legitimate document

Christine Ford has verified it, and not corrected that impression

 

the entire world has stopped

for a piece of draft copy of a fraudulent idea

and oh the damage that has been done with the lies

 

time to sign property over to a husband, quick like

or to get a judge to freeze assets in lieu of a slander suit

 

and

just try to walk into any courtroom and expect to be believed

just try it β€”-

guess whose reputation just went on the skids

and it wasn't Kavanaugh's

 

judges might not like being intimidated by full blown sluts

who sully everything they touch

including a highly regarded Judge who has been victimized

Anonymous ID: 0d108f Sept. 25, 2018, 11:08 p.m. No.3189426   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>3188958

 

highy interesting for context

 

history should be relearned to discover where we are today

and your suggestion makes sense

 

Odd isn't it

that the Jews declared war on Germany

and led worldwide boycotts attempting to bankrupt the country

all the while

Stalin was waiting in the wings to fill in the vacuum

 

There is proof of your claim that it was Masonic

You simply must read:

 

https://archive.org/details/1802ProofsOfIlluminismPayson

 

1802 – written in old english (using f for s)

laments on how good people can result in barbarism like french revolution

 

This 1802 book reveals how Masonic lodges were the vehicle used to slowing introduce progressive anti-gov ideas.

 

simply a must read for historyic perspective

not too long a read

Anonymous ID: 0d108f Sept. 25, 2018, 11:23 p.m. No.3189515   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9603

>>3188958

 

from memory, late at night:

 

WWI – Germany had won the fight before the U.S. entered the war

the nations were worn out – tired – ready to quit and go home

 

No. Not good enough.

Enter a Jewish consortium who propsed that with their connections in American, they could cause the US to enter the war and defeat Germany

IF – the Jews could be guaranteed a homeland in Palestine – that is

 

So – it was agreed. The Balfour letter was signed. Germany was defeated. And it went

to the Paris Peace Talks.

 

Many treaties were being negotiated, and in the middle of this – thinking they'd been forgotten, the Jewish consortium presents the paper – the Balfour Agreement

 

The mess of agreements became so complicated that no one really knows what they agreed to, and who was officially required to sign them.

 

The Jews made promises to Syria and Turkey.

Not kept., if I'm correct.

 

It was about this time that British Petroleum bought Iran's oil at bargain basement prices – and screwed the people of Iran. BP also refused to let the Shah see the paperwork to verify that they were getting at least the pennies agreed to. BP hid the records.

 

Who was the lawyer for BP?

Winston Churchill

 

history is crazy