>>3192866

Not "were"

Which means that all those "conspiracy sites" posting stuff about movement on the moon…

…Are not theorizing anything.

They're more than likely collecting evidence, based on Q's conirm ;p

>>3193523

>conirm

kek 'confirm'

>>3193572

I bet the "Kav filled all my holes at once, with no hands!" one got snapped up fast..