>>319526

I think thta's what they are scared of frankly, but of course there are more hammers dropping so it will pick up again. Wonder which tactic they will (re)try next? Don't care really, but their panic is obvious and it is delicious.

>>319549

A lot of people don't understand the difference between business employment and govt' employment. In the former, if/when your job is done (or you fuck up/are incompetent), you're moved out of that role. In the latter, incompetence is rewarded, same with laziness (many, many jobs are just sinecures) and it is extremely difficult to actually outright fire a federal employee.

POTUS, being from the business world, is more interested in outcome: efficiency, excellence in performance and smoothness. He doesn't have the fedgov mindset, and he's not playing ball by the old playbook. That is why so much of what he does is confounding to the establishment (in general, and the Mockingbirds). He's also slightly unpredictable which they aren't used to and don't like at all.

>>319581

>I want to know everything I can about these connections to Josh Campbell listed in pic related

Use all the sites listed in the Free Research Resources post in the research library thread. You will find a LOT on him using those…

>>319675

I can't into leddit, but was it r/politics or r/T_D that booted all the Brock bois?

>>319684

Thank you for the readable.

>>319715

>Let's focus. what subject needs more exposure? And I mean exposure.

On either The Gateway Pundit or True Pundit today I was reading about the Grassley/Graham memo (the more de-classified one) and how it was far, far more of a bombshell than the Nunes one and it was getting ZERO attention. It seems to me that we should capitalize on the momentum of the public we got all riled up for the Nunes (FISA) memo and get memeing on this one. It also seems to me that the Porter story & the Kelly "resigning" story are to detract from the Grassley memo's revelations. There are several really good articles on both those sites about more aspects to the fuckery surrounding the FISA application & renewals, as well as the tie-ins to Clintons' emails investigation (cross-over personnel)

IMO we should exploit this to the fullest.

Also, and this is not to slide or invite detailed discussions into health, but IMO we should also, really really hammer hard the angle of cancer cures being withhedl. Especially target memes to women (breast cancer, ovarian, etc.). Almost every woman knows another woman who has/had/ or has a family member (mother) affected. Considering that it's fairly easy to manipulate emotional people, this is a beautiful NON-PARTISAN, NON-POLITICAL opportunity that Q dropped in our laps.

>You mean my mother suffered in pain for years, went through chemo and radiation and YOU HAD THE CURE THE WHOLE TIME?!?!?

What happens when you can unite women of all parties/no party, all races, all socioeconomic classes (ok, almost all), all states, all religions into TEEMING MASS OF INFURIATED, SCREECHING HOARDE?

Forget MADD, forget the pussy-hatters. Let's use this, lads.

>>319745

>>319763

Stream of consciousness personal monologue in snippets, m8y? Spit it out in one post, k thx

>>319789

From zoomed out (not clicked on to expand the image) it sort of looks like a clock… gives me ideas. But that info I didn't know and is really important.

>CPage was an undercover employee

>sent to do shady shit with a shady Russian

>sent in to help Trump

>now in place in Trump's team

>4/pol/s prank on @RickWilson passed along to Evan McMullen (NeverTrumpers EM also a cl0wn)

>passed through "the company" network

>gets put in dossier

>shared with HRC camp, pays for dossier

>all sorts of stupid shit passed to Steele

>EHolder passes along "info type requested" to Steele to look for

>dossier done, passed along from GPS Fusion to Crowdstrike

>already in hands of FBI

>used bullshit rumors on /theirboi/ Page to get warrant, specifically to spy on Trump team

>neglected at first to tell Court

1. CPage was an FBI undercover employee

2. dossier was paid oppo research

3. Their informant (who they also paid) was not credible

>For one of the renewals of the warrant, they did tell the Court those things, and got the renewal anyway!

That's some truly sneaky shit right there

>>320025

Ok, thank you. It helps an awful lot if your post is relevant to something, and it's obvious to anons reading, like tagging the post you are referring to. Thank you, I appreciate the clarification.

OH SHIT. Wow Q. Um. This is the non-military Q team member.

Ok.

>>320061

M Rubio, John McTraitor… involved, ok, Q suicide post makes sense now.

And I'll bet even more hammers are dropping.

THE STORM HAS ARRIVED.

[be careful what you wish for]

>>320172

Yes I did read but random half sentences posted that aren't attached to anything are useless if they are posted like that. It's not only simpler but obviously more effective to tag (respond to) the post you are discussing/referring to. Are you new? That's just basic, bro.

>>320195

May not be for us, may be bullshit.