Anonymous ID: 3ea0c9 Sept. 26, 2018, 2:26 p.m. No.3197006   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7033

>>3196810

Wait, wait, wait… What the actual fuck? It's real. This is mainstream divisionfag shilling. What is the fuck is she thinking? I think the DNC have all gone completely mad, and that makes me fully erect.

Anonymous ID: 3ea0c9 Sept. 26, 2018, 2:36 p.m. No.3197158   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7195

>>3197033

Before this all started, it was pretty fucking obvious that Q was trying to point out the fact that "All groups have their (((thems)))". Does that make sense? Any attempt at pointing out just one group (a group, mind you, that isn't even what they claim to be (Khazars and crypto-Germans claiming to be Jews, then blaming them to perpetuate victim status)) is basically division shilling.

 

Sure, it might get us to the eventual "Oh, these kikes aren't kikes because they aren't Semitic anyway; they are impersonators", but it's highly doubtful. What this likely is, is a way for the impersonators to cry foul, and maintain that victim status (rinse, repeat; hey goys - go fight each other again!!!).

 

It's becoming apparent that the gloves are off this time. The question is, are normies and anons smart enough to work through it together this time instead of resorting to the same old shit (calling each other kike, white trash, honkey, nigger, wops, greasers, spics, gooks, etc.).

 

I really hope this Q movement has greased the skids to a better level of understanding, and this incident doesn't fan the flames of some racial conflict on the Kav case in an attempt to muddy the waters.

 

It's the same tripe that anti-Civ Nats come here and spew out of their racists mouths; we're not compatible, so let's just point it out and yell at each other for another 200 years.