>>3198310 <<

>That speech was more for them then it was for us.

He did adress many if not most of the journalists very personally, with comments on their career, etc.

Also particularly striking was when he again pointed out, in a very underlined way, how major MSM outlets would endorse him... something with the way he put that out again didn't sound like his other answers, i found. Your take would explain it well

>>3198368

saw one 2/3 breads back, sorry no direct link, shame it didn't make the dough/notables

>>3198429

wew

that poor old beaten up

playbook

>>3198450

> it can literally be read either way

precisely.

amazing to see so many anons absolutely convinced either way…

>>3198502

thank for your service and sacrifice.

it shall not be in vain.

GODSPEED

o7

>>3198595

give a warning when linking off-thread

>>3198018 <<

>>3198769

Quite amazing indeed.

More people should be nominated to the SC, it would help the D's crimefighting superpowers do even moar good for all

>>3198784

<fill the bern

>>3199050

>>3198828

oh, just you add something after the post number.

usually (lb), or (pb), or <<, or the full (last bread), etc