Anonymous ID: 1431d9 Sept. 26, 2018, 9:47 p.m. No.3203081   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3202998

This has nothing to do with the nuclear option. The nuclear option is about breaking cloture. They still follow certain procedures which aren't likely to change.

 

He'll likely get 60 votes anyway once it comes up. Watchโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 1431d9 Sept. 26, 2018, 10:07 p.m. No.3203286   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3294

>>3203267

I understood anon! Kek to that!

 

I was just pointing out that it's been going on a lot longer than Q. I was skeptical until Q, but always open. It's too much now. The point of no return has been reached.

 

There's a buzz in here and on twatter. It's electrifying.

Anonymous ID: 1431d9 Sept. 26, 2018, 10:15 p.m. No.3203351   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3389

>>3203017

Agreed, anon. Q has been ambiguous most of the time with RR, intentionally, to keep everyone guessing. However, there is a TON of evidence indicating his job is to exonerate Trump.

 

Remember too, above all else, he's not the SCOTUS nomination now because of the Democrats. This is his revenge.

Anonymous ID: 1431d9 Sept. 26, 2018, 10:21 p.m. No.3203404   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3203373

Same with that new doctor show. "Any doctor that puts billing ahead of treatment is fired."

 

Ok, but you still gotta pay those truckers, and the secretaries, and the electric bill. And if you want good truckers, doctors, and secretaries that do their jobs properly, you better pay them well. Eventually, you run out of other peoples' money if you continually put treatment ahead of billing.

Anonymous ID: 1431d9 Sept. 26, 2018, 10:29 p.m. No.3203489   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3509

>>3203445

Also, no, using my logic doesn't mean that, context matters. Learn Q's comms.

 

The bad guys watch the boards, too. They need to believe that RR is working for them while in fact, RR hates them. They fucked him over. He's getting revenge, legally.

 

He's already exonerated Trump - how many times does he have to say "No Americans were involved" before people believe him. How many times do we have to point out that RM did NOT interview for the FBI job before people believe that. How many times do we have to point out that a Special Counsel is NOT independent of Trump?

Anonymous ID: 1431d9 Sept. 26, 2018, 10:35 p.m. No.3203528   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3628

>>3203502

She may be. I don't discredit that. I just know RR has a planned meeting tomorrow as announced by SS AFTER everyone freaked that he was resigning/getting fired, etc. Intentional misdirection.

 

It's not a slide if we're discussing legit hypotheses.

 

And I'm willing to be wrong. Bad guys are going down, I've got no skin in the game if some of them are ones I didn't expect.

 

Sleep well.

Anonymous ID: 1431d9 Sept. 26, 2018, 10:43 p.m. No.3203604   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3203573

Historians will be dissecting what Trump (and Q) did here for centuries. This is part of why we will never (officially) know the whole plan, 40/60 or whatever. We can't - they need to keep some of their "sources and methods" safe forever, in case they need to do it again.

Anonymous ID: 1431d9 Sept. 26, 2018, 10:51 p.m. No.3203663   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3203593

They can't be dirty, or leveraged. They still need to be legal. Any "taint" would kill either side.

 

If they are dirty but working for /theirguys/, then any dirt they "gin up" on Trump can easily be dismissed as illegal, Trump walks away with only a slight public hit.

 

If they are dirty but working for /ourguys/, then any exoneration they issue for Trump (which they have already done) gets dismissed by the left and nobody believes them.

 

Both sides need them to be clean. By this point, the DS knows, it's just optics to keep the public guessing.