>318894

>>319593 <- from prev. bread

>I'm glad tht you brought up the British Crown, and why I mentioned earlier that the roths are barely 200+ years in. the British Empire precedes them by at least 300 years.

Because your post is thoughtful and intelligent, I will take the time here to share another piece of the puzzle with you so you may judge for yourself the potential inaccuracy of the above statement.

The Rothschilds, as you implied are comparatively new on the scene, BUT BY THAT NAME ONLY. They came into your history line there after having changed their name from “the Bauers” (of Germany). That was the name chosen by a group also known as the Khazarian mafia, whose origins can be traced back all the way to before 800 AD.

Hence, the implication that the British Empire preceded the Roths by 300 years could be viewed as factually incorrect because the Roths were really Bauers who were really Khazarians who already had an established corrupt history before there was a British Empire.

Being a thoughtful type, you will appreciate all the gaps filled by reading this article:

veteranstoday.com/2015/03/08/the-hidden-history-of-the-incredibly-evil-khazarian-mafia/

Whoever is not familiar with the Khazarian Mafia or the history and/or origin of the Rothschild family, will do themselves well to read that article. It's in depth enough to cover all the relevant information but condensed enough to not be book length.