Anonymous ID: 11c5ea June 3, 2018, 12:03 p.m. No.1619641   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0170

>>1560936

 

….but the chess game is over an Q is still on 1 of 22 missions. None of the pieces represent major players. There are no Rothschilds, Bushes, Clintons, or Soros' represented.

 

Q has made enough references that the chess seems important; but it doesn't seem quite as literal as you are making it. I wish I had more energy to figure it out.

Anonymous ID: 11c5ea June 23, 2018, 2:30 p.m. No.1878726   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8923

>>1620170

 

I provided facts. You just ignored them. I provided facts straight from Q.

 

Q has said they're on mission 1 of 22. He has said they're going to reveal 40% and that we know less than 2%. By both of those measures, we have gone less than 5% of the journey. The chess game is clearly more than 5% over. Therefore, either the chess game is not literal or Q is full of shit. I choose to believe Q.

 

At the very best, we can say this chess game is a proof or a marker. Clearly, it's not the MAP or a guide to the plan. Anyone saying otherwise is the one that needs to provide the sauce.

Anonymous ID: 11c5ea July 4, 2018, 4:29 p.m. No.2033789   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5371 >>5550

>>1878923

 

What theory are you whining about? I mentioned facts. You don't like facts?

 

Dictionary.com can hep you understand the difference between facts and theories.

 

Funny how 100% of the serious research Anons don't spend a minute of their time here.

 

There might be something to the chess. Clearly, you are completely clueless as to what that might be. You are the opposite of an autist. When you've got something real to share, share it.

Anonymous ID: 11c5ea July 28, 2018, 12:03 p.m. No.2326708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0615

>>2045550

Source? Q.

Outright lie? Who do they represent? Show that what I'm saying isn't true.

Proof of this? You can't prove something that doesn't exist, fucktard. Learn logic. Tough talking to someone who doesn't understand logic. I can't prove that the pieces don't represent major players. I'm saying that no proof exists that they do. No one has proved any evidence that they DO represent major players. Prove that Barack Obama didn't secretly blow you a kiss when he woke up this morning. Are you starting to grasp logic and proofs?

 

The burden of proof is on the person positing a theory. It wasn't up to other people to prove to Einstein that energy didn't equal mass times the speed of light squared. It was up to Einstein to prove that it did. You're posing that Q's chess game is real and meaningful. SO PROVE IT! It would a source of great joy to all Anons. It's not up to me to prove that it doesn't. Do you see how logic works?

 

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: b189f8 No.130638 📁

Jan 22 2018 21:47:32 (EST)

What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family?

What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?

Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22].

This is only the beginning.

Be careful what you wish for.

AS THE WORLD TURNS.

Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed?

What happens to the FBI?

What happens to the DOJ?

What happens to special counsel?

What happens in general?

Every FBI/DOJ prev case could be challenged.

Lawless.

Think logically.

We haven’t started the drops re: human trafficking / sacrifices [yet][worst].

Those [good] who know cannot sleep.

Those [good] who know cannot find peace.

Those [good] who know will not rest until those responsible are held accountable.

Nobody can possibly imagine the pure evil and corruption out there.

Those you trust are the most guilty of sin.

Who are we taught to trust?

If you are religious, PRAY.

60% must remain private [at least] - for humanity.

These people should be hanging.

Q

 

The burden of proof is on YOU. You're trying to prove the chess game has significance. SO, DO IT!!!

 

Who do the pieces represent?

Use the information to derive ANYTHING of meaning regarding Q.

The reason this thread is dead is because NO ONE hasn't proven anything of value.

 

Today's post said D5. I visit the chess thread to see if there's any signs of intelligence or meaning. Nope.

 

You challenge a real Anon and they don't turn into a whiny little bitch. THEY RESEARCH!

 

When's the last time you generated a meaningful idea in this thread related to the chess game? Forget about me and focus on Q.

 

I'm open to the possibility that there's something to Q and chess. I just haven't seen one meaningful piece of information come out of it. Say something meaningful regarding Q and chess.