Just discovered this thread after a link in the General a few days ago. I'm an excellent chess player (winning record against International + Fide Masters, 0-1 against GMs). I've been following Q since the beginning. I don't know what to make of this though.

Obviously, there's something to chess because Q keeps referring to it, but I just looked through this whole thread and I'm seeing a bunch of stretches.

To be honest, I don't understand stringers at all, but it looks like people are just picking random letters and numbers to match up the game. I see the same thing in the non-stringer moves. On the other hand, some of Q's post scream legit chess moves.

A post referenced David Rothschild, the economist, playing chess. I was under the impression that this David Rothschild was not related to the Rothschild family….that David de Rothschild (who's a different person) is the one related to the banksters.

Also, I saw posts with inaccurate predictions (like Clintons going down + storm starting).

I want to help, but I'm having trouble getting oriented.

What's the point of Q referencing the game?

How do you reconcile Q saying he was altering the time table with the chess game?

The theory is that the Cabal's moves are so predictable that they can pin them to a chess game and that the pieces represent people?

I'm torn. On one hand, I see chess referenced by Q + Assange. On the other hand, I see nothing fruitful coming out of this thread.

I think I have the skills (chess + conspiracy knowledge) to contribute. I just need a little guidance. Someone care to paint the bigger picture as it relates to chess?