Anonymous ID: 0fbd1d Sept. 27, 2018, 10:32 p.m. No.3226780   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3226626

Laying it out:

LG and BK agreeing

a) US still in a state of war

b) citizens that collaborate with the enemy can be considered enemy combattants

c) and can be tried by the military

d) and has led to executions

Anonymous ID: 0fbd1d Sept. 27, 2018, 10:53 p.m. No.3227095   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7128

>>3227073

Here you are, anon son!

I know how much you love and follow that strange Q fellow.

I wanted to get you a Q shirt, but the man at the store said they didn't have anything like that.

But he did have this really nice R shirt!

That's almost the same, right?

Enjoy!

Anonymous ID: 0fbd1d Sept. 27, 2018, 11:01 p.m. No.3227224   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7251

>>3227179

Have never seen Wikipedia scrub an entry from an article's history before today. Same thing on the other affected pages. Normally every edit is kept forever as a rolling history of the evolution of the article โ€“ even blatant vandalism edits and shitposting.

Anonymous ID: 0fbd1d Sept. 27, 2018, 11:06 p.m. No.3227292   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3227251

They scrub it, but if the article still exists, you can dig into the revision history and find the excised version of the article.

This one has been crossed out and the link has been disappeared.

(yes I know articles are deleted all the time for a variety of reasonsโ€ฆ but have never come across this type before today.)