Anonymous ID: a90a9a Sept. 27, 2018, 10:49 p.m. No.3227053   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7082 >>7112 >>7200

>>3226626

Here's the Transcript of Graham questioning then:

 

G: So when someone says post 911, that we've been at war and it's called the War on Terrorism.. Do you generally agree with that concept?

K: I do Senator, because congress passed the 'Authorization for use of Military Force' which is still in effect, and that was passed of course on Sept 14th 2001 - 3 days later.

G: Let’s talk about the Law in War. Is there a body of Law called the Law of Armed Conflict?

K: There is such a body Senator.

G: Is there a body of Law that's called Basic Criminal Law?

K: Yes Senator.

G: Are there differences between those two bodies of Law?

K: Yes Senator.

G: From an American citizens point of view, do your constitutional rights follow you? If you're in Paris does the Fourth Amendment protect you as an American from your own government?

K: From your own government, yes.

G: Ok, so if you're in Afghanistan do your Constitutional Rights protect you from your own government?

K: If you're an American and you're in Afghanistan you have Constitutional Rights as against the US Government. That's long settled Law.

G: Isn't there also long settled law that.. it goes back to Eisentrager case, I can't remember the name of it–

K: Yeah, Johnson vs Eisentrager.

G: Right. That American citizens who collaborate are considered Enemy Combatants?

K: They can be–

G: Can be–

K: They can be. They're often– they're sometimes criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the Military [sense?].

G: Lets talk about can be. I think the–

K: Under Supreme Court precedent, I just want to make– Yeah.

G: Right. There's a Supreme Court decision that American citizens who collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the Military, is that correct?

K: That is correct.

G: I think, a couple of them were executed.

K: Yeah.

G: So if anybody doubts there's a long standing history in this country.

[End of video]