Amy Klobuchar is interviewed by KMSP-TV in Minneapolis.
It's early in the morning and she is HAMMERED!!!
August 22, 2013.
Snagged around 50 caps during Mitch's dance with the clown.
Posted 15 or so next several breads; Mitch is a PRO!!!
I didn't collect any during Kav's slot…couldn't see for shit! Eyes were stinging.
Ok now!
Bread's moving slow, could post caps of "evidence".
Anons knew, highly autistic ones instantly!
The eyes, activated.
Raised in the southern Rockies, school was canceled during hunting season.
Fill the freezer, cull the herds, healthy stuff. Whole community is involved.
After some time has passed, one is able to "read" a hunter and assess skill level. Don't know exactly what he knows ]INTEL[ but he KNOWS.
Read Mitch much the same way. Hunter. PRO.
Book of living close to the land and all it provides.
Not being a dick either.
It's plainly evident in these series of photos.
Obviously, not too all.
Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking
I read this in one sitting. My thoughts? Well, duh!
Anyway, this is the closest book I can suggest that describes what some are very good at doing.
Ignorance can be dealt with. Stupidity? Give 'em a hug if they are yours, do not scold…
The author describes the main subject of his book as "thin-slicing": our ability to use limited information from a very narrow period of experience to come to a conclusion. This idea suggests that spontaneous decisions are often as good as—or even better than—carefully planned and considered ones. To reinforce his ideas, Gladwell draws from a wide range of examples from science and medicine (including malpractice suits), sales and advertising, gambling, speed dating (and predicting divorce), tennis, military war games, and the movies and popular music. Gladwell also uses many examples of regular people's experiences with "thin-slicing," including our instinctive ability to mind-read, which is how we can get to know a person's emotions just by looking at his or her face.
Gladwell explains how an expert's ability to "thin slice" can be corrupted by their likes and dislikes, prejudices, and stereotypes (even unconscious ones). Two particular forms of unconscious bias Gladwell discusses are implicit association tests[1] and psychological priming.
Gladwell also mentions that sometimes having too much information can interfere with the accuracy of a judgment, or a doctor's diagnosis. In what Gladwell contends is an age of information overload, he finds that experts often make better decisions with snap judgments than they do with volumes of analysis. This is commonly called "Analysis paralysis." The challenge is to sift through and focus on only the most critical information. The other information may be irrelevant and confusing. Collecting more information, in most cases, may reinforce our judgment but does not help make it more accurate. Gladwell explains that better judgments can be executed from simplicity and frugality of information. If the big picture is clear enough to decide, then decide from this without using a magnifying glass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blink:_The_Power_of_Thinking_Without_Thinking