>just trying to piece together both pics related

Murder me if u must. It's just a wild thought I had after studying both pics. But, it depends on 1. Both white cars pictured being the same car. & 2. If that interior pic is from the black merc.

If the black car is difi as Q alluded to, could that photo be from her phone, NSA(SIGINT) style?

& at the same time snap the other pic, presumably from /our/ guys following them? With the intention of using the 2nd pic to prove 1st pic & as a message to (((them/difi))) at the opportune time proving they were under both physical & SIGINT surveillance? Which would allude to Q 'having it all.'

Idk. Again just a quick thought i had trying to tie both pics together. Just wanted to run it by the hive mind.

I'll gladly fall on my sword if need be.

>>3229173

Thanks anon, have a (you)

It hit me when trying to line up both pics location. White car is in left lane with 1st pic being from middle lane & 2nd pic from the right lane.

Provided the white car is NOT the target, why would 2 surveillance teams be taking pics facing the same direction? Not to mention the potential obviousness of 2 surveillance cars/teams being the 2 closest vehicles to target.

>>3229314

Could be but imo that interior one is a pretty bad pic if they were trying to target the white car. Makes more sense they got the interior intentionally so either the vehicle make can be proved and/or as a sign/message to whoever was in that car(assumed difi per Q).