or guests. thanks.
>POTUS = People of the United States
NICE. I hadn't seen that conversion yet. Nice job if you came up with it.
>Whoever enabled unauthorized persons to enter the SCIF may also guilty of crimes.
I'm gonna go with:
Whoever enabled unauthorized persons to enter the SCIF IS guilty of crimes.
no
Good thing we have SCIF facilities with such a glaring hole in the protocol. Not surprised at all.
As soon as Trump announced he would run and then actually started campaigning, I saw this video and Seth Meyers humiliating Trump viciously. Watching Trump's body language, I knew something was up. Here's a link tot he whole video: https:// www. youtube.com/watch?v=0Km4R377s4M
I no lawyer but I do write my own contracts and have a bit of experience (I have lawyers review them.) That EO is BROAD. It is basically a field day on any corruption in government. I think it targets all things that can cause any bias in decisionmaking, which is (once again) BROAD.
c'mon…you don't think Pepe being a frog was an accident, do you?
If you do, think about it. What do you call a group of frogs? Why? Can you not see the cultivation of this environment for this purpose? What would you do if you knew this was coming and you were a military strategist?
Nah…just an accident. Nothing to see here. (Friggin' brilliant.)
I agree for many. I've had experience with some, though - I think some will be more in a state of denial because they're just as brainwashed that their shit will never fail than the normies are about reality. Some will go into denial and not realize they're really fucked until they finally realize they're sitting in a cell after sentencing for the rest of their lives. Then they'll lose their shit.
Yes, although it would have taken a while. Pressure would have continued to build and at some point it would be much uglier even if the problem were being solved - lone wolves would be pulling stupid shit.
Instead, this move by Q gave enough of us a reason to argue for caution and patience, which is perfect. Many of us are still watching VERY CLOSELY for full follow through as I think we all should be. This is very deep and this cannot be a partial happening.
>I'm sure that Q could doxx us all if he wanted to
If you don't think you were ID'd very quickly after first appearing, you don't understand Q's resources.
Worrying impedes success. Watch, analyze, decide, act. Repeat.
>Problem is nothing has REALLY happened either way to prove Q is on our side and not on theirs.
There have been events that have happened that show Q is good. However, analyzing the whole thing looking through this straw is impossible depending on how deep of a scenario you're trying to solve for. There are a lot of smart people in here. I think the structure of the corruption is weaker than most assume (looking at the frightening details.)
Also, commodity technology has gotten to the point where a few individuals can now make devices that can completely confound the historical corrupt structures, so I'm very optimistic in the long-term outcome. If the asshats are sufficiently damaged, they're fighting a technology close and they'll lose.
The species is getting very close to the point where it transitions into a collaborative cognition state where historical decision-making is left behind in favor of a structure that is derived from the scientific method rather than proxies (ie: democracy.)
And I'll stop there.
Godspeed, anon.
>>I have seen no credible evidence Q is not legit.
>Exactly why I've been here since the beginning. Will always have my guard up though, just in case.
yes. trust but verify.
Also, if Q were bad and the point was to take us out, that would have happened. It didn't. The only other scenario is an even deeper ruse, but I don't think that's the case. The reason is that as the asshats get more corrupt, they rely more on experts and the ability to get the best drops. So, I think they got high on technical superiority (SIGINT), became fat and stupid and now they're paying the price. The honest guys in their own structures rebelled against them and are now handing them a nice pain sammich.
KeK
Not to slide, but I think it'll servo toward technologically aided systems (like this board as a very crude piece) which help groups of people make decisions. The hierarchy of such systems could range from small to large. Government is just a decision-making system. Corporate governance is just a decision-making system.
The reason I say this is I've done much research into it. It is possible to structure such a system such that both corruption and stupidity is naturally smashed out of the result without the participants even being aware of it. It would be an apex predator of any cabal. Also, no non-computer-aided system would come close to it in efficiency. The intelligence guys in Q may know what I'm talknig about. I understand there exists something like this in use for 15 years now. I won't specify anything further. Fun stuff.