>>323577

Isn't Q just giving a "future proves past" type photo?

What is the point of trying to figure out what airport that is, or what's going on? Does Q send out special Q gold stars?

We learn what happened, and then we go "oh, that's what the Q airport photo was about. That proves that Q is legit."

I have no idea why everyone is racing around to try to figure out where that airplane was.

If Q said "this is Vietnam", what would we all do? Go "oh"? Point is, why does it matter what that picture of that plane is of? We'll find out soon enough. Or we won't. Why are 2/3s of the posts on the last 2 of these things about figuring out what that airport is? Or what P is? What use value do those 2 things have?

>>323742

My core question was - why do we care?

I don't understand why "WHAT IS THE PLANE" is such a big deal.

I'm new here to 8, but not to 4, and know how these things go. This detective stuff, does it serve a useful purpose?

Isn't it ALWAYS just "future proves past"?

Isn't it always just "oh, yup, there this piece of data that tends to support the position that Qanon is an insider and we should continue to pay attention?" We don't get prizes for figuring out what airport q might or might not be at.

"All hands on deck, if we can find out what airport Q was at, RIGHT NOW, then ……….. what?" I'm not sure what.

Bringing some prisoners back to the US, I'm guessing? Does it matter at all what airports are involved?

Has anyone started to make guesses based on Vietnam? Has anyone said "well, if Vietnam, then X?, but if not Vietnam then Y, or at least not X?" I haven't seen anything like that, just pictures of airports. For what reason am I seeing pictures of airports?

People have this theory that if Q puts a picture in a post, Q is doing this as a fun puzzle to be solved immediately, so they try to solve this puzzle immediately. Why do people think that Q is presenting puzzles to be solved? Doesn't he say "future proves past" all the time? "Future proves past" means - you'll understand later what these things mean, so don't worry if you don't understand it right away.

>>323852

That EO from 12/21 is huge, yes, I'd think that they wrote the EO specifically to get specific people, a large number of specific people.

Many of the people they want to get are people who have been funding foreigners who have done human rights abuses, and corrupt public officials are in there too. So, if they know that Rothschild and Soros are funding bad actors, write the laws so that you can grab all the Rothschild and Soros money. Rothschild just sold a huge estate in Austria, probably because they figured it would be seized.