BECAUSE YOU CAN ID A BUILDING BY ITS ARCHITECTURE, YOU MYOPICFAG!!
Are we looking for positive ID certainty here, or not!…If so, WE SHOULD USE ALL THE "REFERENCE" DATA WE CAN PULL OUT OF THE PIC, AND SCOUR THE WEB FOR IMAGES THAT CONFIRM OR DISPROVE.
I found the (pics related) above shitty phonefaging, but some imagesearchfag could do better, I'm sure.
Jesus did say, however, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him." (John 6:53–56)
Jesus wasn't Cabal, btw…just the Agnus Dei, hence why He said it.
None taken.
Interesting that contemporaneous 1st Person accounts/writings are legitimately used by scholars as primary sources to authenticate history is acceptable in all cases excepting those that bear witness to the Truth of the historical Jesus, isn't it?
Ops can have Inter-Agency Handlers; think film directors: off set, behind the camera. Sets can be large or small. Unlikely Handlers get their OWN hands "dirty".
Could easily travel separately w or w/o "the package".
>"All hands on deck, if we can find out what airport Q was at, RIGHT NOW, then ……….. what?" I'm not sure what.
Profit!
>>>324025
>you can see rain drop on window smear left of center
Autist right he-yah! That's what I'm talking about!!