>>3235043 (lb)

>>3235103

I could buy that it's "cover" for Flake, maybe.

But why does he need cover? What leverage exists over him that would be defused by this measure, but not immediately reapplied if the scenario plays out as you suggest?

He doesn't need cover in electoral terms. It's obvious that the cabal still has some kind of leverage over him.

And if the FBI says "nope," those who control him would still expect him to throw a further tantrum and suggest that the process is inadequate (as the Dems will in any event).

>>3235102

Completely nonsensical. Alyssa Milano "measuring angles" on a smartphone – for someone also already in the room? And in a room full of people that have gone through a heavy security check?

>>3235205

>>3235230

>>3235248

>>3235262

>>3235323

Seems like that would be a recipe for losing the swing votes, as things stand.

>>3235396

Yeah, maybe. Just keeping them off balance.

>>3235401

F-F-F-FUCK YOU

>>3235489

>He won’t get elected again if he says nay.

Anon, I…

>>3235490

Okay. But using Alyssa Milano's smartphone to measure "angles" for said pseudo firearm? Nonsensical.

>>3235558

Okay, so what does he need "cover" for?

>>3235435

Pretty sure that's how it works, yes.

>>3235751

>0:00-3:50 Attention whore is attention whore.