I posted a response to an anon's speculation this morning and it made the notables.

>>3229794, >>3229866 Anons speculate Kav's feared power is to fortify Exec v. Jud branch

I wanted to add something, since it seems my post's meaning wasn't understood.

While Kavanaugh's appointment to the SC will help to correct the imbalance of power in the justice system legislating from the bench the case I cited is all about the power of the people.

how can you defend your rights if you do not know what they are?

When you sit as a juror do you know what your rights are?

If you think the judge will tell you YOU ARE WRONG

In Sparf v US it was determined that the judge has no duty to instruct the jury in it's rights. And if you think judges do not mislead juries you haven't been around a courtroom much.

To really understand what is going on you must understand why we have juries

If an unjust law is passed, and a person is put on trial and the evidence proves guilt what happens? Should an unjust law ruin a person's life? The system is set up to prevent that.

In all criminal cases the jury shall have the right to judge the facts of the case as well as the law

(((they))) call it jury nullification, when the jury finds the defendant not guilty even when the facts say otherwise.

The ulimate power belongs to the people

but the people cannot use their power if they do not know have it