Anonymous ID: d159b2 Sept. 29, 2018, 3:38 a.m. No.3246741   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6764 >>6778

>>3246657

Well done! I disagree with you only in this:

>A rock will stand on seven hills.

>God will reign over the middle-east, bringing peace to the region

Seven hills is a well-known reference to Rome (the Catholic Church). The rock ("Upon this rock I will build my church" Matthew 16:18) will be a new and godly pope.

So, a new Pope will "stand" and restore the Catholic church to a righteous path.

Anonymous ID: d159b2 Sept. 29, 2018, 3:53 a.m. No.3246789   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6858

>>3246778

>Like rehab for the Vatican?

No, as I said, replacement of the Vatican.

In reclaiming earth, would God continue to allow that evil to work in his name?

>It's built on an evil foundation, you know.

Jesus Christ is the foundation. The perversion is entirely man's doing.

Anonymous ID: d159b2 Sept. 29, 2018, 4 a.m. No.3246822   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6833

>>3246764

>Clearly u havenโ€™t read Matthew 23. CC is the Antichrist.

The CC didn't exist in the time of Matthew. He was talking about the Pharisees.

29 ยถ Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,

30 and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.

31 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

Have you read Matthew, Anon? Did you understand it?

Anonymous ID: d159b2 Sept. 29, 2018, 4:09 a.m. No.3246857   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6880

>>3246833

>You HAVE ONLY ONE.

Yes. As I said, Jesus is the foundation of the Church. All the "rabbi, Father, or teacher" is man's perversion.

Your quoting Christ's admonishment against this perversion does not equate to the Church being the Antichrist - who is clearly a specific being, not a group.

Anonymous ID: d159b2 Sept. 29, 2018, 4:13 a.m. No.3246872   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3246858

>I'm not sure we need organized religion.

I agree. I do not belong to any religion, but I do consider myself a Christian.

>Can't see anything good coming out of that (pic related)

We all came out of (pic related), anon!