Anonymous ID: 033868 Feb. 10, 2018, 2:05 a.m. No.325219   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5229

>>325186

I'm pretty convinced "the promise of blockchain" is a sophisticated ruse by NSA to fool the cabal into thinking there's something they can jump to this time.

 

To complex you ask? Well, remember that this would be coming from the same cranial freaks who thought it would be fun to use [e][5][-] as a hint that some dick in Asia just got busted for $800M in BTCโ€ฆ

 

If I were in the NSA with another 100-200 of meโ€ฆ.I'm pretty sure we could hatch that one.

 

For me? I don't think blockchain is anything but clever obfuscation. I suspect NSA has the hardware to chew through it pretty quickly if they want to.

Anonymous ID: 033868 Feb. 10, 2018, 2:11 a.m. No.325256   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5334 >>5340

>>325221

Thing is, with a law, any non-money money is dead. Always has been.

 

Perfect honeypot to 'give' to the cabal without the cabal believing anyone could actually SEE their transactions. So, you use it to see what they're doing with their money when they freak out and then you arrest their happy asses. Seems like a damn good plan with exactly one use to me. Next up, digital currencies are illegal.

Anonymous ID: 033868 Feb. 10, 2018, 2:13 a.m. No.325270   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>325232

Math: -e^5 = 100,000

BTC fraud bust for 100,000 BTC just went down in Asia. Also, e is "Euler's number" and "eule" in German means "owl" in English. So, the BTC belonged to the owls (Illuminati asshats.)

Anonymous ID: 033868 Feb. 10, 2018, 2:28 a.m. No.325428   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5489

>>325334

Bottom line is: Legislation + NSA. If they want to, they'll make it illegal. Should they? That's a different question.

 

You can't revolutionize only money and not governance in general without a world of hurt. Digital money will only happen reliably when both are switched out. Not just money. (Think taxes.)

Anonymous ID: 033868 Feb. 10, 2018, 2:39 a.m. No.325531   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5752

>>325489

This topic will come up in time. Open source, open specification distributed secure computing platforms are a necessary precursor to privacy & security on which to build other things like money and governance. Let's not slide the board.

Anonymous ID: 033868 Feb. 10, 2018, 2:59 a.m. No.325723   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>325712

You need open source AND open specification. Open source is ripe for obfuscation. With open specification, you can do a cleanroom implementation from the spec and check against other implementations. Prevents fuckery. (Also include self-testing machinations to make validation easier.)