My synopsis, but another anon came up with the e^5 part and yet another anon came up with "eule"->"owl". I just summarized. (Head explodia.)
THANKS. KINDA KEYED UP.
I'm pretty convinced "the promise of blockchain" is a sophisticated ruse by NSA to fool the cabal into thinking there's something they can jump to this time.
To complex you ask? Well, remember that this would be coming from the same cranial freaks who thought it would be fun to use [e][5][-] as a hint that some dick in Asia just got busted for $800M in BTCโฆ
If I were in the NSA with another 100-200 of meโฆ.I'm pretty sure we could hatch that one.
For me? I don't think blockchain is anything but clever obfuscation. I suspect NSA has the hardware to chew through it pretty quickly if they want to.
I tried to find a photo to post but I couldn't find anything that dumb.
Thing is, with a law, any non-money money is dead. Always has been.
Perfect honeypot to 'give' to the cabal without the cabal believing anyone could actually SEE their transactions. So, you use it to see what they're doing with their money when they freak out and then you arrest their happy asses. Seems like a damn good plan with exactly one use to me. Next up, digital currencies are illegal.
Math: -e^5 = 100,000
BTC fraud bust for 100,000 BTC just went down in Asia. Also, e is "Euler's number" and "eule" in German means "owl" in English. So, the BTC belonged to the owls (Illuminati asshats.)
Maybe the drool was JFK's way of getting back at him.
Something rotten in Denmark? (smh)
Ugh. Yes, at this point I'd believe most things.
by the way, spooks everywhere just shat themselves.
Bottom line is: Legislation + NSA. If they want to, they'll make it illegal. Should they? That's a different question.
You can't revolutionize only money and not governance in general without a world of hurt. Digital money will only happen reliably when both are switched out. Not just money. (Think taxes.)
40/60 - probably not.
This topic will come up in time. Open source, open specification distributed secure computing platforms are a necessary precursor to privacy & security on which to build other things like money and governance. Let's not slide the board.
FUCK YES: P
No - whoever gives Soros orders. Could be Roths or some council of Freemason crap.
Maybe they'll let you squeegee up the messโฆ
I think CIA and the cabal is the same piece.
There's your [3].
Q may be signalling for leaks to be dumped?
You need open source AND open specification. Open source is ripe for obfuscation. With open specification, you can do a cleanroom implementation from the spec and check against other implementations. Prevents fuckery. (Also include self-testing machinations to make validation easier.)
National Anthem playing on FOX? WTF?
Did we just see MSM switch into a completely different gear?
Not specifying, but I haven't seen one like that in a long time.
Media reporting doesn't appear to have shifted. CNN is still leaning really heavily away from Trump. Fox is leaning the other way. Just updating everyone not watching.
Ouch.
Not flattering photo for O.
^ This.