Anonymous ID: 3614a5 Sept. 29, 2018, 1:58 p.m. No.3252796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2990

>>3252724 (previous)

 

Your interpretation. That post specifically is one that could be interpreted at least three different ways.

 

>>3224486

 

A) K will be confirmed

 

B) If K is confirmed RR is done

 

C) RR will be gone when K is voted on

 

D) some variation or other possible interpretation…

Anonymous ID: 3614a5 Sept. 29, 2018, 2:15 p.m. No.3253084   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3137

>>3252990

 

Welcome aboard what? Yes, it's suggestive, it implies. It is not a specific yes/no statement. Even if it is exactly what you said and he is going to be eventually confirmed, that doesn't rule out their using the investigation to uncover swamp rats…

Anonymous ID: 3614a5 Sept. 29, 2018, 2:22 p.m. No.3253217   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3268

>>3253137

 

Nope. I still don't agree with your statement. But I was offering a compromise for discussion purposes. From what we know of the cabal, the kinds of activities K has been accused of may well have taken place, even if K wasn't a part of them. A thorough investigation could uncover significant dirt, even if it didn't tie directly to K. It's entirely possible some of these things were put out there to threaten others who would be the only ones to understand the threats due to their direct participation in activities K was being accused of…

Anonymous ID: 3614a5 Sept. 29, 2018, 2:28 p.m. No.3253313   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3340

>>3253268

 

Ohhhh…. you're psychic…. rolls eyes

 

BS, it's call speculation and argument, but thanks for making it clear conversing with you is just shitting up the bread.

 

Sorry to those who aren't this idiot.