>>3253132 pb

Screens don't look real.

There were posted in there to cover what was underneath. I think they are CG . Screens are funky.

3253525

Dems can't meme.

There are some thing money just can't buy.

>>3253666

also try fotoforensics?

Is that what that was?

>>3253824

This is what I got at fotoforensics

>>3253824

>>3253893

http://www.fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=177da00106329300af86988299d7345e4e2a7b45.145467

I 'm not 100% expert at reading the ELA . It's just suggestive. There are other evidences which have to come into play

I don't "get" the weird interference pattern and the right side of the right screen and below it

>>3253950

>>3253824

>>3253893

I'm thinking now after reading this

>>3253887

which re-enforced what I was already thinking:

Perhaps the screens just look like that.

Perhaps they are special screens, with special coatings?

It was NASA after all? Didn't they invent Tang?

>>3253861

I got something different from the on-line fotoforensics.com site

>>3253893

>>3254112

It was a different wold back then CRASSenstein.

>>3254128

Wasn't it in somewhere claimed she drank a lot and had over 10 partners. "Sex Revolution" days and all that?

As any courtesan if she would be traumatized 35 years later for being touched on the breast at a party.

kek