>>3252200 (lb)

Christine Ford - 2nd entry to home. "We now have a place to house Google interns."

Google, Twitter, FB all have a lot to lose.

They don't like his dissent on US TELECOM ASSOCIATION v. FCC

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=608357842885836722&q=855+F.3d+381+&hl=en&as_sdt=4,130&as_vis=1

This is a portion of Kavanaugh's dissent: (Apply it to sites like Google, Twitter, Facebook.)

For a broadband ISP that holds itself out to consumers as a "neutral, indiscriminate conduit" — i.e., as a pathway to "all content on the Internet, without alteration, blocking, or editorial intervention," Order ¶ 549 — the rule requires the ISP to abide by its representation and honor its customers' ensuing expectations. The ISP therefore cannot block its subscribers' access to certain websites based on its own preferences. Nor can it engage in "throttling," which, while stopping short of outright blocking, degrades a user's experience with selected content so as to render it largely, even if not technically, "unusable." Id. ¶ 17. Nor can an ISP create "fast lanes" favoring content providers who pay the ISP (or with whom it has a commercial affiliation), while relegating disfavored (i.e., nonpaying) providers to "slow lanes." Id. ¶¶ 18, 126. Like blocking and throttling, paid prioritization practices of that variety are incompatible with a promise to provide a neutral, indiscriminate pathway to content of a customer's own choosing.>>3252200