Anonymous ID: ebf751 Sept. 29, 2018, 6:30 p.m. No.3257398   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7463 >>7479

>>3257309 (pb)

I get your drift, Anon.

 

Red Wave is what we need at the moment, but we have to keep in mind that draining the swamp is going to bring down the GOP as we know it after it brings down the Demonrat Party.

 

We ought to be preparing for a new regime in terms of how party politics work in America. Maybe a true multi-party system rather than the two-party system which was essentially introduced to maintain an illusion of choice while the Committee of 300 controlled both choices.

 

Kek Party sounds about as good as any.

Anonymous ID: ebf751 Sept. 29, 2018, 6:37 p.m. No.3257502   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7529 >>7561 >>7640 >>7754

>>3257463

I do have a concern, looking 5-10 years down the road, that draining the swamp could have the unintended side effect of creating a de facto one-party state.

 

Everywhere in the world where one-party states have existed (Cuba, NK, Laos, Pol Pot's Cambodia…) it has been a disaster.

 

True enough that the Demonrat Party needs to die, but we need to preserve a multi-party system going forward.

Anonymous ID: ebf751 Sept. 29, 2018, 6:47 p.m. No.3257670   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7777

>>3257587

I get the positive part of your sentiment, but that is essentially what Pol Pot, Fedel Castro, Josef Stalin, and Ho Chi Minh all said.

 

A multi-party system that forms coalition governments based on specialization in various issues (breakthrough energy tech, real cures in healthcare, honest education, honesty financial system, etc.) could also be "America First".

 

Wherever a one-party system has taken hold, it has quickly grown corrupt and despotic even when its founders were more or less patriotic.

Anonymous ID: ebf751 Sept. 29, 2018, 6:57 p.m. No.3257835   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7846

>>3257754

One thing that could help ease the transition would be if the patriotic Anons on this board would:

 

a) consider running for office, if they are qualified, during the period of political vacuum, and

 

b) consider forming one or more new parties. The 2018 elections are still too early for this but history suggests that when a political vacuum develops, the groups that act quickest to fill it have a big advantage over those that are slow to get their act together.