>>3259955 (LB)

I don't think it's Bromwich, anon….

unless it also fits the next REDACT.

This is in the 1st Paragraph. If Mr Michael Bromwich is true

as you say,

then the next Mr BOX must also refer to him.

See my meaning? It's syntax.

>>3260551

>>3260823

So based on RAW discrete 17's only including the Time Stamp you just showed,

there are 7 (seven) seventeens (17).

>>3261080

>>3261159

yep, every time….

• waste the bread,

• contribute nothing to the MAP / News / Plan

• aids & comforts the Clowns / MSM to further

distract more normies away from Q

• past "research" has amounted to nothing

useful going forward

• & if Vincent et al connection real, been

Doxxed pretty obviously for MONTHS,

yet No DS Clowns have taken him out.

• Q has not ONCE replied to anything Muh Jr

is alive, ….

• need I go on???

>>3261043

>because Blasey Ford gave Emma Brown of WaPo the smear story as early as July 10th

This seems pretty Glaring, anon…..

the date in her testimony? or elsewhere??

Isn't this pretty fukkin problematic?!!!