Anons come out of nowhere and complain about things that aren't being discussed at the moment.
So we got dude that somewhat resembles a dead man and a woman who very much resembles his girl - wearing a ring that appears to match the dead man's mothers ring.
That's pretty attention grabbing.
Good catch, but it could be the other grandparents.
How's it feel being a time traveler before the technology exists to retain memories when you go back?
>Red symbolizes Blood or Violence.
Symbolizes a lot of things. Not the best conclusion to jump to.
Depends on how many dogs are around.
I'm not too bothered by that.
POTUS took the job to soak up the ridicule. He encourages it. It truly doesn't hurt him one bit.
So those that ridicule him don't bother me because nothing bad comes from it. Those that actively work against him are the ones that bug me.
The akashic records. The totality of all experience past, present and future. It's like tapping into the memory of god.
Kek
On the bright side, ya can't be yelled at by anons who filter you.
Agreed.
Hard for me to see the plan here - if they are a part of it.
Guys like Avenatti wouldn't surprise me if they were in on it because everything they do helps the plan. Despite their behavior, they are still assets.
Jones and the like are harder to see. There is the undeniable benefit of 'half-pilling' people, with some gatekeeper behavior thrown into the mix. In the end, I still can't see where they would fit.
I get yer point, but I do believe there is a bit more transparency than that. Though I fully agree with the 'future proves past' bit.
I figured Red October was a reference to a redwave movement towards repubs in the midterms. Or potentially the enemy destroying themselves with their own attacks.
Not gonna say one way over another for certain because it's impossible to know.
I've never believed dems were anywhere near 50%. Voting and polls are rigged to make it seem that way - and for good reason.
All we need for a 'red wave' is for the voting to be unrigged.
Pic related worked for me.
Thanks mang.
Got that version in hardcopy as well.
There are some differences - and I still prefer 'Hypostasis of the Archons' over 'Reality of the Rulers' but to each his own.
The game of chess started with one side loosing their king. They think they can run the show without him, but they just cant.
They can make a lot of noise, and wreck a shit load of pawns on the other side, but they can't win. It's already been decided.
Yes she is.
Right
But there seems to be more to it.
I've often thought that this movement needs to be genuinely grassroots - in the most spiritual sense.
The same way the white hats have to follow the law - the movement has to be pure. Guys like Jones and Icke have a ton of influence which could easily throw a grassroots movement into a cultlike status. If they are in on the plan, their job would be to get out of the way and deny Q.
(Where is the same "soul" today then? And why would you know these "theories"?)
Same place it always was.
They are ready for it. They just don't want it.
It's like getting stung by a wasp. 99% will survive it - and those that don't have some preexisting conditions.
It wouldn't be fun, but it's never as bad as most think.
Requires we get into duality. Big conversation that starts with the claim that we are all in the same place right now - and we've always been there and will never leave. We can direct our attention to whatever existence we desire, but only in a limited sense can we experience it.
And thats how you sell your soul.