Tim Ball: The Evidence Proves That CO2 Is Not A Greenhouse Gas

https://www.technocracy.news/tim-ball-the-evidence-proves-that-co2-is-not-a-greenhouse-gas/

The CO2 error is the root of the biggest scam in the history of the world, and has already bilked nations and citizens out of trillions of dollars, while greatly enriching the perpetrators. In the end, their goal is global Technocracy (aka Sustainable Development), which grabs and sequesters all the resources of the world into a collective trust to be managed by them.

The most important assumption behind the AGW theory is that an increase in global atmospheric CO2 will cause an increase in the average annual global temperature. The problem is that in every record of temperature and CO2, the temperature changes first. Think about what I am saying. The basic assumption on which the entire theory that human activity is causing global warming or climate change is wrong. The questions are how did the false assumption develop and persist?

>>3261777

I think it was people inside Clowns In America who were the smart ones. But if they are foreign combatants due to treason, INSCOM has probably been taking the out since Jan 2017 as part of the 60% that won't be publicly disclosed for 50 years.

Makes sense when you think about the kind of people that the CIA tries to recruit, including autists. The real Christine Blasey seems to be an Autist, given all her work in Biostatistics, but I'm not convinced that it was her who testified at the Senate.

Google CM Blasey to find all her scientific papers.

Think about how the Mafia works. The Dons are tough nasty guys, and so are all the made men. But there are a few people that work directly for the Don, the consigliere and the accountant. These guys are quiet and in the background. They aren't even allowed to be involved in the nasty business because the Don values them and their mental health to much.

It is people like that, who have been fading out of sight while heads of families like Evelynn and Lynn Rothschild seem to be doing business as usual.

Of course I don't really believe they are untouched. I think all their assets have been seized and now they are working as trustees for the new owner. That way, the value of the assets are maintained and the markets do not get any jitters. Once people realize what is happening, the markets will still remain calm because they will see that for the past year or so, the new owners have been keeping things in a state of calmness and no reason to expect that to change drastically.

All this talk of a reset is nonsense. The changes made to everything, will be gradual and step by step, so that we don't descend into chaos and break things. Stable genius is also a genius of stability.

>>3261883

It is surprising how many Anons do not even notice when somebody tries the consensus trick. Or they argue against the points provided rather than calling the whole assertion into question.

A valuable quote here.

Harvard graduate, medical doctor, and world-famous science fiction writer, Michael Crichton provides an excellent riposte.

“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.”

>>3261908

The earlier version of this work

Is attached as a PDF

Nag Hammadi Library

>>3261741

Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that male faces with extreme features associated with testosterone are perceived as dominant and masculine. Women have been reported to prefer more masculinized male faces as they may consider testosterone markers to be an 'honest' indication of good health, and such considerations may underlie their aesthetic preferences. However, pronounced testosterone facial markers are also associated with dominance, and several negative personality traits. This suggests that female aesthetic preferences may be an adaptive compromise between positive attributes associated with higher than average testosterone, and negative attributes associated with more extreme masculinization. This current study attempts to clarify the role of hormone markers in female perceptions of dominance, masculinity and attractiveness, in male facial images. Recent evidence suggests that the relative length of the 2nd to 4th finger (2D : 4D ratio) is a pointer to prenatal testosterone levels and may thus serve as a window to the prenatal hormonal environment. We measured 2D : 4D in a sample of male college students and took salivary samples to analyse circulating levels of testosterone. Women rated facial images of these males for dominance, masculinity and attractiveness. Our results show that male 2D : 4D was significantly negatively related to perceived dominance and masculinity but not attractiveness. Circulating testosterone levels were not related to dominance, masculinity or attractiveness. These findings suggest that: (i) high prenatal levels of testosterone serve to 'organize' male facial features to subsequently reflect dominance and masculine characteristics presumably activated during puberty; and (ii) attractiveness is not directly related to testosterone levels. We conclude that facial dominance and masculinity reflect a male's perceived status rather than his physical attraction to women.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691489/

All Anons can learn how to do research like this too.

When you search for some key words add DOI as one of the keywords and you will get a lot more scientific papers in your results.

>>3261970

Sorry for confusing you on the last bread

When I posted about consensus of the board

Gotta give folks a chance to wake on their own

Before you shine the flashlight in their faces.