Oh. This just gets curioser and curioser
Anyone's guess at this point, but the identity created is not real - or does not seem to be
So there is a clear connection to the CIA. That much has been dug up - at least the connection exists to the identity that was created. And it is clear that the 'story' was at least somewhat lifted from Judge's book - for the timeline. And after some of what I saw today, it appears that Q posted about it on June 28 - if you read that drop it starts to fall into place/get spooky at the same time
kek
From what I was reading in the digs earlier today, none of her 'papers' can actually be found, at least not with her currently stated name. Even the letter she sent to WaPo wasn't signed. Nor was her statement, I believe (not 100% on that one)
The created identity works for the 'abortion pill' company. Family has CIA connections to hell and back. But it's all too…something isn't right about it all - could just be because so much of her stuff was scrubbed from the internet in early September though
Dad, CIA. Brother, CIA. It's all insane
Exactly. The way it was all constructed is just …circles. And more circles. I watched dig after dig over the past several days
and then there's this Q drop, and think about the plane pic today
I am still trying to figure out who invented her - us or them. It is a conundrum
that is NOT who testified
Yeah, I am starting to wonder. That's why I grabbed/posted crumb again
Father linked to Fentanyl. Fentanyl >>China. China>>Feinstein. See what I mean? Circles and circles
I am on the fence - the clues and circles reek of Q. But could just as easily be CIA
This was Kavanaugh not allowing himself get steered down that path at ALL because one single admission/acknowledgement would have been a total disaster. They were trying and trying to push him there. He knew not to go. He could NOT go down that path. Could not discuss it even a little bit other than yes, he drank, yes he likes beer. Avoidance of the topic = smart. Does not mean that he drank to blackout.
Precisely. But think how they could/would have twisted it if he had given them the tiniest little space to do so.
It was a simple matter of 'how to be a witness 101'
Wasn't me - happened a few breads ago when very shilly. I just reposted someone else's thought now that it is quiet
No, but it slid the bread and muddied things up quite handily
Interesting. You think this is the woman who testified?
I ain't afraid of no goats
I know the type
Stupid song is stuck in my head now
Yeah, I think I get it. It makes a lot of other things add up. Puts it in that class of 'this is so much bigger than you know' or whatever it was Q said
The hook brings you back…
kek
Brain worm. Did you ever see that vid of Joe Walsh talking about brain worms?
Kek! Yes
Kek! Where have I seen this before
Wait a minute. Q said 'Command and Chief' instead of Commander in Chief? wtf
Oh no. No no no. Nope.
not exactly, that doesn't account for the extra 'and'. just a weird mistake for Q to make
Well someone did. It's in the class with 'should of' instead of 'should have' or 'all intensive purposes' instead of 'all intents and purposes'
so what's the meaning? haven't seen this one explained