>>3265216 (lb)
>faraday cage
no, I meant "Faraday shield". a cage only attenuates radio signals. a shield blocks them completely. see: TEMPEST
well then everyone should research it and decide whether they think I'm wrong. if I were a clown, I'd tell everyone they were the same thing. they are not.
>Sounds good. You will get the same info searching for either term.
no, you won't. a Faraday cage is usually a mesh or sheet of metal with holes in it. a Faraday shield is solid sheets of metal. for example, SCIFs are made with solid sheets for exactly the reasons I mention here.
this matches the spoopy anon post from last bread.
>I'm fine with you thinking Faraday Cages and Faraday Shields are different
I'm sure you are since I just explained the difference.
never claim to know things you don't know, but when you do, argue it to the end. this way, when you're proven wrong, you learn.
hahaha - is that Trump's penthouse as an example of a Faraday shield? if so, that's priceless! thank you, anon!
really. interesting. my information comes from SIGINT papers describing the differences and effectiveness of each. if security is important, there's an enormous difference.