#BO, please review Baker from previous two posts and their inability or lack of desire to bring attention to serious and compelling data in regards to Diane Feinstein and her husband, Richard Blum's, connection to China and the California UC Board of Regents from primary source data. Despite acknowledge and despite multiple anons calling on it as such important data said Baker has discarded the addition and considering its importance to the QAnon post dated 27 Sep 18 there should have been absolutely no question in any Baker's mind about its importance. Review material asserted by Baker from those two breads and activities.
No, do not desire a ban and considering I have provided more data over the course of the Qanon time period than everyone combined, which the BO will be able to verify through IP, I believe I have the right to call for that to be looked into as it is clearly obvious that information into Feinstein is being squelched.
I do not ask for a ban or anything along those lines but merely the BO look at it and proceed from there. If you do not like it, fair enough.