Anonymous ID: 8ebb22 Sept. 30, 2018, 7:03 p.m. No.3272711   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2746 >>2798 >>2958

NC GOP Chief: Kavanaugh 'Gang-Rape' Accuser Is A "Criminal" Who Should "Go To Jail, Period"

 

Following reports this weekend that Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley had referred a man who had accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of raping one of his friends to the DOJ for a possible criminal prosecution, the leader of North Carolina's Republican Party tweeted that another Kavanaugh accuser, Julie Swetnick - who gave a taped interview to Show Time's "The Circus" which is expected to air Sunday night - "should go to prison."

 

In a series of tweets, Dallas Woodhouse, the executive director of the NC GOP, said Swetnick - whose claim that Brett Kavanaugh participated in "gang rape" parties with members of his high school social circle has been widely dismissed as "not credible" and even "ridiculous" - is "a criminal" who may have "participated in a conspiracy to facilitate child rape" as an adult, and that "she should go to prison, period." He also claimed that she is guilty of lying to Congress with the explicit knowledge of her lawyer Michael Avenatti, who is seeking to make a name for himself before declaring a bid for the 2020 Democratic Party nomination.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-30/nc-gop-chief-3rd-kavanaugh-accuser-criminal-who-should-go-jail-period

Anonymous ID: 8ebb22 Sept. 30, 2018, 7:04 p.m. No.3272739   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2825 >>2830 >>2857 >>2904 >>2956 >>2957 >>2973

New Yale Accuser: Says Will Tell FBI He Saw Kavanaugh ‘Throw Beer in a Man’s Face’ at College Party

 

A new Yale accuser of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is coming out with accusations that Kavanaugh drank a lot at college parties and once tossed beer in a man’s face. The accuser, Chad Ludington, a former classmate of Kavanaugh’s, told the media he has contacted the FBI and will be going to the Raleigh, North Carolina, field office Monday to file a report. He says Kavanaugh lied to the Senate about his drinking at college. Kavanaugh admitted he drank too much at times when in school.

 

The New York Times reported on Ludington with a headline and lede:

 

Yale Classmate Accuses Kavanaugh of ‘Blatant Mischaracterization’ of His Drinking

 

A Yale classmate of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s accused him on Sunday of a “blatant mischaracterization” of his drinking while in college, saying that he often saw Judge Kavanaugh “staggering from alcohol consumption.”

 

The classmate, Chad Ludington, who said he frequently socialized with Judge Kavanaugh as a student, said in a statement that the judge had been untruthful in testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee when he had denied any possibility that he had ever blacked out from drinking.

 

Mr. Ludington said that Judge Kavanaugh had played down “the degree and frequency” of his drinking, and that the judge had often become “belligerent and aggressive” while intoxicated. Other former classmates have made similar claims.

 

“It is truth that is at stake, and I believe that the ability to speak the truth, even when it does not reflect well upon oneself, is a paramount quality we seek in our nation’s most powerful judges,” Mr. Ludington said, adding that he planned to “take my information to the F.B.I.”

 

Mr. Ludington, a professor at North Carolina State University who appears to have made small political contributions to Democratic candidates, said to The New York Times on Sunday that he had been told by the F.B.I.’s Washington, D.C., field office that he should go to the bureau’s Raleigh, N.C., office on Monday morning. He said he intended to do that, so he could “tell the full details of my story.”…

 

The Washington Post folded Ludington’s accusation into an article on the Kavanaugh FBI investigation.

 

Charles Ludington, a former varsity basketball player and friend of Kavanaugh’s at Yale, told The Washington Post on Sunday that he plans to deliver a statement to the FBI field office in Raleigh on Monday detailing violent drunken behavior by Kavanaugh in college.

 

Ludington, an associate professor at North Carolina State University, provided a copy of the statement to The Post.

 

In it, Ludington says in one instance, Kavanaugh initiated a fight that led to the arrest of a mutual friend: “When Brett got drunk, he was often belligerent and aggressive. On one of the last occasions I purposely socialized with Brett, I witnessed him respond to a semi-hostile remark, not by defusing the situation, but by throwing his beer in the man’s face and starting a fight that ended with one of our mutual friends in jail.”

 

Ludington says he was deeply troubled by Kavanaugh appearing to blatantly mischaracterize his drinking in Senate testimony.

 

“I do not believe that the heavy drinking or even loutish behavior of an 18 or even 21 year old should condemn a person for the rest of his life,” Ludington wrote. “However … if he lied about his past actions on national television, and more especially while speaking under oath in front of the United States Senate, I believe those lies should have consequences.”

 

Kavanaugh said in his opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, “Sometimes I had too many beers. Sometimes others did. I liked beer. I still like beer. But I did not drink beer to the point of blacking out, and I never sexually assaulted anyone.”

 

Ludington’s accusations were made to the Post and Times the same day as Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) insinuated Kavanaugh doesn’t remember any memory losses because…he drank too much to remember any memory losses.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/new-yale-accuser-says-will-tell-fbi-he-saw-kavanaugh-throw-beer-in-a-mans-face-at-college-party/

Anonymous ID: 8ebb22 Sept. 30, 2018, 7:06 p.m. No.3272761   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2896

EU States Ready to Finance Disarming of Militants in Syria - UN Chief's Aide

 

Many EU countries are interested in Syrian refugees' return to their homeland, and they will be ready to invest in a disarmament program of militants, UN Assistant Secretary-General for Rule of Law and Security Institutions in the Department of Peacekeeping Operations Alexander Zuev told Sputnik.

 

The preparation of such a program may take several months, but there is still no a corresponding mandate of the UN Security Council neither a request from Damascus, Zuev said.

 

"[Disarming of militants] is profitable to donor nations [EU member states] from all points of view, including for gaining political capital or due to social-economic reasons. Other states, such as France or the United Kingdom, have historic responsibility, as they have been traditionally actively involved in Middle East affairs," Zuev said.

 

According to Zuev, it is easier for EU states to "make a one-time investment in our program rather than to look for these militants in their own countries, some of whom pose security threats."

 

Such countries as Sweden, Germany, Norway, the Netherlands and France are also interested in stopping migrants flows from the Middle East and from Syria, in particular, Zuev noted.

 

According to him, the Department of Peacekeeping Operations has a special branch dealing with disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of members of armed groups into society. However, at the moment, there are no legal grounds for starting such a process in Syria.

 

"There is no a UN Security Council mandate, neither a request from the Syrian government," Zuev explained.

 

"Our department is now engaged only in the mine clearance operations in Syria and the relevant agreement was signed on July 4 with the government of the Syrian Arab Republic, and this was the first official agreement between the United Nations and Syria," Zuev added.

 

https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201810011068475926-eu-states-ready-disarm-militants/

Anonymous ID: 8ebb22 Sept. 30, 2018, 7:08 p.m. No.3272792   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Pat Buchanan: ‘Trend Worldwide’ is National Sovereignty, Not Bush’s ‘New World Order’

 

Populist conservative author and columnist Pat Buchanan says the “trend worldwide” is toward President Trump’s worldview of national sovereignty and away from the Bush dynasty’s desired “New World Order.”

 

During a panel discussion on The McLaughlin Group, Buchanan said in response to Trump’s anti-globalism, pro-Americanism speech at the United Nations last week that the president is leading the trend worldwide.

 

“The trend worldwide now is not towards George W. Bush, H.W. Bush, New World Order, it’s not towards global democracy, it’s not toward transnationalism anymore, it’s not towards institutions like the [World Trade Organization],” Buchanan said.

 

“All around the world, tribalism, nationalism, sovereignty, these are becoming issues,” Buchanan continued. “What’s driving these is people’s want to be … you know like ‘Let Poland be Poland,’ and also the trade issues. And this is where the world is going whether we like it or now, [Trump’s] correct.”

 

The anti-war, former Republican presidential candidate also warned the Trump administration against a war with Iran, an initiative that he says is being pushed by Washington, DC’s national security establishment.

 

“Look, there is a real drive toward a war with Iran,” Buchanan said. “There’s no question about it. It’s inside the beltway. You can read the op-eds in the papers. You can read the attacks on Iran, the terrorist attack in Iran.”

 

“This is where we are headed,” Buchanan said. “Except for North Korea, Trump’s policy on Russia, China, Syria, and areas like that are like Obama’s on they’re harder line.”

 

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/30/watch-pat-buchanan-trend-worldwide-national-sovereignty-not-bushs-new-world-order/

Anonymous ID: 8ebb22 Sept. 30, 2018, 7:11 p.m. No.3272848   🗄️.is 🔗kun

California's Jerry Brown signs tough net-neutrality bill, prompting Justice Department lawsuit

 

California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the nation's toughest net neutrality measure Sunday, requiring internet providers to maintain a level playing field online. The move prompted an immediate lawsuit by the Trump administration.

 

Advocates of net neutrality hope the new law in the home of the global technology industry will have national implications by pushing Congress to enact national net neutrality rules or encouraging other states to follow suit.

 

But the U.S. Department of Justice wants to stop the law in its tracks, arguing that it creates burdensome, anti-consumer requirements that go against the federal government's approach of deregulating the Internet.

 

"Once again the California Legislature has enacted an extreme and illegal state law attempting to frustrate federal policy," U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement.

 

The law is the latest example of the nation's most populous state seeking to drive public policy outside its borders and rebuff President Donald Trump's agenda.

 

Brown did not explain his reasons for signing the bill when the decision was announced, but supporters cheered it as a win for Internet freedom.

 

"This is a historic day for California. A free and open internet is a cornerstone of 21st century life: our democracy, our economy, our health care and public safety systems, and day-to-day activities," said Democratic Sen. Scott Wiener, the law's author.

 

The Federal Communications Commission last year repealed rules that prevented internet companies from exercising more control over what people watch and see on the internet.

 

Telecommunications companies lobbied hard to kill it or water it down, saying it would lead to higher internet and cellphone bills and discourage investments in faster internet. They say it's unrealistic to expect them to comply with internet regulations that differ from state to state.

 

USTelecom, a telecommunications trade group, said California writing its own rules will create problems.

 

"Rather than 50 states stepping in with their own conflicting open internet solutions, we need Congress to step up with a national framework for the whole internet ecosystem and resolve this issue once and for all," the group said in a Sunday statement.

 

Net neutrality advocates worry that without rules, internet providers could create fast lanes and slow lanes that favor their own sites and apps or make it harder for consumers to see content from competitors.

 

That could limit consumer choice or shut out upstart companies that can't afford to buy access to the fast lane, critics say.

 

The new law prohibits internet providers from blocking or slowing data based on content or from favoring websites or video streams from companies that pay extra.

 

It also bans "zero rating," in which internet providers don't count certain content against a monthly data cap – generally video streams produced by the company's own subsidiaries and partners.

 

Oregon, Washington and Vermont have approved legislation related to net neutrality, but California's measure is seen as the most comprehensive attempt to codify the principle in a way that might survive a likely court challenge. An identical bill was introduced in New York.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/10/30/californias-jerry-brown-signs-tough-net-neutrality-bill-prompting-justice-department-lawsuit.html

Anonymous ID: 8ebb22 Sept. 30, 2018, 7:16 p.m. No.3272940   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2965

>>3272896

They are shitting themselves, Russia is setting up their EW's everywhere; good luck getting anywhere near your proxy army to save them! They will be caught and exposed! Too funny!