>>3272979
>>3272892
The truly notable part about this, for me, is explicitly what I've highlighted - and that the AP chose to allow that phrasing pass their editorial process.
HUGE
if it's not illegal it should be left alone.
If it is illegal, there's already laws and guidelines on how to handle it and what to do.
also remember, Net Neutrality was sold to us as 'not limiting pipelines' or throttling - it had nothing to do (publicly) with limiting content selectively…
Whatever happened to/with the story that came out about the FBI essentially hosting hundreds of thousands of pics n videos of CP?
threw a beer n a man's face at a party…
How utterly leftist-cuck in the choice of attacks - no actual man would 'ever' throw a drink in another mans face. Punch? sure. Possibly even break a bear bottle over another mans head - but never a drink in the face.
I think 'he' is Priestap