Anonymous ID: 4a1d62 Sept. 30, 2018, 8:46 p.m. No.3274170   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4174 >>4183 >>4206 >>4281 >>4387

>>3274007

Anons

Be skeptical of this.

I nominated for notable, but maybe prematurely.

  1. It is to" all REPUBLICAN senators, not ALL senators - odd.

 

  1. The bullet points read like she's been lurking on this board - I've read the exact same language/syntax here.

 

The timeline section is not normal for this type of document.

Anonymous ID: 4a1d62 Sept. 30, 2018, 9:02 p.m. No.3274387   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3274170

I guess it's legit.

 

This from Drudge (WaPo Link)

 

Rachel Mitchell's analysis

http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/politics/rachel-mitchells-analysis/3221/

 

My bad, anons. Just being cautious.