Anonymous ID: 6b32c8 Sept. 30, 2018, 8:19 p.m. No.3273844   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3892 >>3902

>>3273825 (LB)

 

he was top-kick at the SDNY during the relevant time frame (from ~2012 ish to dec 2015) where he then took over the CI div. at Washington and has been since.

 

He was the man in the middle between McCabe and Strzok

 

He's not been removed, reassigned or in any way really affected negatively, other than his name coming up over n over again - but never followed up on - in the Spygate news

 

there's a lot more to support my theory but it's too late on a Sunday for me to go back through and compile it all again. I've done so more than a few times in the past year on PB's.

 

But it is just a theory and a gut feeling.

Anonymous ID: 6b32c8 Sept. 30, 2018, 8:24 p.m. No.3273902   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3927 >>3931

>>3273844

I will say this regarding Priestap:

 

He KNOWS what's on the Weiner laptop. Weather or not he's FBIAnon is simply my gut feeling, but he knows.

 

He was in THE position to know everything that's on that laptop, from the desktop background image to the # of bytes free on the primary drive.

 

he knows.

Anonymous ID: 6b32c8 Sept. 30, 2018, 8:30 p.m. No.3273975   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3273931

stuck in the middle. Career guy who has no history prior, of being involved in shady shit. Knowing that there's no way to bring charghes (at the time) based on who is in power, who would actually act upon any recommendation of charges and etc.

 

Like I said last bread, there's too much for me to go back and recompile again, this late on Sunday when I get up in 5 and a half hours.

 

There's plenty of reasonable but 100% circumstantial evidence. There's also plenty of reason (although like the supporting evidence, it is totally opinion based) to say he's not.

 

Really what cinches it for me is comments from Nunes and a few others, when asked about Priestap - (sic) "oh you're going to be hearing a lot more about him soon"