>>3273953

Here's the wapo full text

http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/politics/rachel-mitchells-analysis/3221/

>>3273953

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4952137/Rachel-Mitchell-s-analysis.pdf

>>3273998

>>3274048

>>3274061

>>3273953

It's not up on the Committee on the Judiciary website yet. Assume it's just because it's so late at night. Check here about 9 am tomorrow

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/nominations/judicial

>>3274067

The seal of her office is on it anon, not the Judiciary Committee.

>>3274092

Yes, but she submitted it related to the Kavanaugh hearing. It's to "All Republican Senators," so protocol would mean likely sent to Grassley. I'll check his website.

>>3274217

Why would the D's leak a memo that was sent only to the Republican Senators, and is so damaging to them?

>>3274246

>>3273970

He's an alcoholic (recovering)

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/21/stephen-king-shining-sequel-interview

Total projection. Got a recovering alcoholic friend who's insisting the same thing.

>>3274305

>No POTUS tweet about the new USMCA deal made?

Interdasting. His last tweet was 9 hrs ago.